Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C939

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 17:42, 18 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C939_neuroblastoma_argyrophil_small_cerebellum_retinoblastoma_pineal_medulloblastoma



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:182543057..182543068,-p1@GQ904713
Hg19::chr2:182543197..182543218,-p4@NEUROD1
Hg19::chr2:182543249..182543261,-p5@NEUROD1
Hg19::chr2:182543547..182543559,-p9@NEUROD1
Hg19::chr2:182545234..182545252,-p1@NEUROD1
Hg19::chr2:182545296..182545307,-p3@NEUROD1
Hg19::chr2:182545330..182545341,-p2@CERKL
Hg19::chr2:182545363..182545372,-p3@CERKL
Hg19::chr6:66194027..66194031,-p@chr6:66194027..66194031
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0030902hindbrain development0.0428039440196433
GO:0004143diacylglycerol kinase activity0.0428039440196433
GO:0043010camera-type eye development0.0428039440196433
GO:0007205protein kinase C activation0.0428039440196433
GO:0001654eye development0.0428039440196433
GO:0009952anterior/posterior pattern formation0.0428039440196433
GO:0032147activation of protein kinase activity0.0428039440196433
GO:0045165cell fate commitment0.0428039440196433
GO:0007423sensory organ development0.0428039440196433
GO:0003002regionalization0.0428039440196433
GO:0007200G-protein signaling, coupled to IP3 second messenger (phospholipase C activating)0.0428039440196433
GO:0007389pattern specification process0.0436576993985432
GO:0048015phosphoinositide-mediated signaling0.0436576993985432
GO:0007420brain development0.0436576993985432
GO:0045944positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter0.0436576993985432
GO:0045860positive regulation of protein kinase activity0.0436576993985432
GO:0033674positive regulation of kinase activity0.0436576993985432
GO:0051347positive regulation of transferase activity0.0436576993985432
GO:0032501multicellular organismal process0.0496195203628137
GO:0007601visual perception0.0496195203628137
GO:0050953sensory perception of light stimulus0.0496195203628137
GO:0045893positive regulation of transcription, DNA-dependent0.0496195203628137
GO:0007417central nervous system development0.0496195203628137
GO:0045859regulation of protein kinase activity0.0496195203628137
GO:0043549regulation of kinase activity0.0496195203628137
GO:0051338regulation of transferase activity0.0496195203628137
GO:0043085positive regulation of catalytic activity0.0496195203628137
GO:0019932second-messenger-mediated signaling0.0496195203628137
GO:0003702RNA polymerase II transcription factor activity0.0496195203628137
GO:0045941positive regulation of transcription0.0496195203628137
GO:0045935positive regulation of nucleobase, nucleoside, nucleotide and nucleic acid metabolic process0.0497326468379995



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen

Disease
Ontology termp-valuen


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.