Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1224

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:14, 10 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{MCL_coexpression_mm9|gostat_on_MCL_coexpression=GO:0005096;GTPase activator activity;0.003266495597277;216445!GO:0008047;enzyme activator activity;0.003266495597277;216445!G...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr10:126759057..126759082,+p8@Arhgap9
Mm9::chr11:106022022..106022035,-p11@Limd2
Mm9::chr4:120647785..120647794,-p@chr4:120647785..120647794
-
Mm9::chr4:120648011..120648037,-p6@Smap2
Mm9::chr4:120648047..120648070,-p5@Smap2
Mm9::chr4:120648071..120648079,-p8@Smap2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0005096GTPase activator activity0.003266495597277
GO:0008047enzyme activator activity0.003266495597277
GO:0030695GTPase regulator activity0.0045733790285238
GO:0043087regulation of GTPase activity0.0471714856983727



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:



"{{{coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median}}}" is not a number.

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen

Disease
Ontology termp-valuen


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}