Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:673

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:43, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr15:54242363..54242376,+p@chr15:54242363..54242376
+
Mm9::chr3:86350565..86350577,-p@chr3:86350565..86350577
-
Mm9::chr3:86351974..86352003,-p5@Mab21l2
Mm9::chr3:86352190..86352212,-p1@Mab21l2
Mm9::chr3:86352240..86352250,-p7@Mab21l2
Mm9::chr3:86352359..86352374,-p3@Mab21l2
Mm9::chr3:86352399..86352406,-p9@Mab21l2
Mm9::chr3:86352449..86352465,-p2@Mab21l2
Mm9::chr3:86352504..86352520,-p4@Mab21l2
Mm9::chr3:86352529..86352542,-p6@Mab21l2
Mm9::chr3:86352800..86352805,+p@chr3:86352800..86352805
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0010172embryonic body morphogenesis0.00857718680500183
GO:0010171body morphogenesis0.00857718680500183
GO:0009790embryonic development0.00857718680500183
GO:0005537mannose binding0.0141304035005386
GO:0048029monosaccharide binding0.0172657606177491
GO:0007157heterophilic cell adhesion0.0172657606177491



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
neuron5.41e-0833
neuronal stem cell5.41e-0833
neuroblast5.41e-0833
electrically signaling cell5.41e-0833

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
eye6.78e-089
camera-type eye6.78e-089
simple eye6.78e-089
immature eye6.78e-089
ocular region6.78e-089
visual system6.78e-089
face6.78e-089
optic cup6.78e-089
optic vesicle6.78e-089
eye primordium6.78e-089


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}