Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1119

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 02:38, 17 September 2013 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1119_nonsmall_smallcell_argyrophil_small_duodenum_esophagus_cerebellum



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:5406920..5406934,+p2@UCN3
Hg19::chr10:5406935..5406962,+p1@UCN3
Hg19::chr10:5407062..5407072,+p3@UCN3
Hg19::chr10:5407085..5407093,+p5@UCN3
Hg19::chr2:241836244..241836276,-p2@C2orf54
Hg19::chr6:18208375..18208387,+p@chr6:18208375..18208387
+
Hg19::chr8:141018677..141018706,-p5@TRAPPC9


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0007189G-protein signaling, adenylate cyclase activating pathway0.0100553396915107
GO:0007188G-protein signaling, coupled to cAMP nucleotide second messenger0.0100553396915107
GO:0019933cAMP-mediated signaling0.0100553396915107
GO:0007187G-protein signaling, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messenger0.0100553396915107
GO:0019935cyclic-nucleotide-mediated signaling0.0100553396915107
GO:0005179hormone activity0.0149044311001217
GO:0019932second-messenger-mediated signaling0.0157776992817614



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
small intestine4.76e-224
intestine1.87e-1617
maxillary sinus6.06e-131
paranasal sinus6.06e-131
gastrointestinal system2.24e-1125
uterine epithelium2.43e-072
cervix epithelium2.43e-072
open tracheal system trachea4.98e-072
subdivision of digestive tract6.12e-07118
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
somatostatinoma4.77e-131
paranasal sinus cancer6.06e-131
maxillary sinus cancer6.06e-131
respiratory system cancer3.28e-0716


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.00215847
MA0004.11.25543
MA0006.10.341337
MA0007.11.21493
MA0009.10.973289
MA0014.10.187674
MA0017.10.380797
MA0019.10.652951
MA0024.10.867125
MA0025.11.10816
MA0027.12.59001
MA0028.10.35747
MA0029.10.886702
MA0030.10.875089
MA0031.10.809638
MA0038.10.60704
MA0040.12.0669
MA0041.10.521615
MA0042.10.48922
MA0043.10.973609
MA0046.10.962263
MA0048.10.120314
MA0050.10.490116
MA0051.10.602745
MA0052.10.896548
MA0055.10.158296
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.369442
MA0058.11.84591
MA0059.11.04442
MA0060.10.224688
MA0061.10.198335
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.607474
MA0067.11.29359
MA0068.11.51089
MA0069.10.958358
MA0070.10.947018
MA0071.10.567661
MA0072.10.942461
MA0073.11.13289
MA0074.10.60198
MA0076.10.422297
MA0077.10.934645
MA0078.10.703614
MA0081.10.405093
MA0083.10.980893
MA0084.11.48179
MA0087.10.939982
MA0088.10.917255
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.436918
MA0091.10.505453
MA0092.12.05178
MA0093.11.63168
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.621149
MA0101.10.347695
MA0103.11.58817
MA0105.10.104569
MA0106.10.648997
MA0107.10.274127
MA0108.20.806528
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.45062
MA0113.10.665691
MA0114.10.269076
MA0115.11.21667
MA0116.10.277571
MA0117.11.01134
MA0119.10.388712
MA0122.11.03753
MA0124.11.17486
MA0125.11.0901
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.722072
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.00402
MA0136.10.614215
MA0139.10.547495
MA0140.10.564957
MA0141.10.403171
MA0142.10.777365
MA0143.10.66587
MA0144.10.254954
MA0145.10.276317
MA0146.10.0127148
MA0147.10.768766
MA0148.10.528066
MA0149.10.555119
MA0062.20.193221
MA0035.20.564239
MA0039.22.22341
MA0138.20.704862
MA0002.20.611548
MA0137.20.36398
MA0104.20.636673
MA0047.20.636643
MA0112.20.0758925
MA0065.20.591589
MA0150.10.430951
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.571637
MA0153.11.07307
MA0154.10.335384
MA0155.10.534073
MA0156.10.36627
MA0157.10.749547
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.281681
MA0160.10.543522
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.0249953
MA0163.10.0765396
MA0164.10.678332
MA0080.20.344472
MA0018.20.650405
MA0099.20.572
MA0079.20.945415
MA0102.21.51913
MA0258.10.245543
MA0259.11.43531
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.