Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1601

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 17:28, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1601_Mallassezderived_Gingival_Keratinocyte_Prostate_Sebocyte_salivary_cervical



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:93107524..93107535,+p@chr10:93107524..93107535
+
Hg19::chr11:102140952..102140956,+p@chr11:102140952..102140956
+
Hg19::chr1:116072140..116072172,+p@chr1:116072140..116072172
+
Hg19::chr5:159849184..159849205,+p4@PTTG1
Hg19::chr5:159849211..159849231,+p5@PTTG1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
endo-epithelial cell9.95e-1543
embryonic cell1.41e-13248
non-terminally differentiated cell4.32e-10180
general ecto-epithelial cell1.27e-0913
endodermal cell1.69e-0959
respiratory epithelial cell1.23e-0813
somatic cell1.64e-08591
animal cell1.54e-07679
eukaryotic cell1.54e-07679
skin fibroblast6.49e-0723
ectodermal cell8.01e-0771
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
surface structure1.00e-1695
integument4.58e-1445
integumental system4.58e-1445
skin of body1.36e-1340
multilaminar epithelium1.84e-0882
skin epidermis3.19e-0814
outer epithelium3.19e-0814
enveloping layer of ectoderm3.19e-0814


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.