Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2347

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:03, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2347_Monocytederived_Olfactory_Prostate_leiomyoma_Hair_mesenchymal_Smooth



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr15:72491702..72491722,-p@chr15:72491702..72491722
-
Hg19::chr15:72491827..72491839,-p@chr15:72491827..72491839
-
Hg19::chr15:72491849..72491869,-p@chr15:72491849..72491869
-
Hg19::chr15:72491889..72491935,-p@chr15:72491889..72491935
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
animal cell6.88e-23679
eukaryotic cell6.88e-23679
somatic cell4.49e-14591
non-terminally differentiated cell6.91e-14180
native cell6.79e-12722
epithelial cell2.54e-09254
embryonic cell2.98e-09248
fibroblast6.90e-0975
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
multilaminar epithelium8.62e-0782


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066445.360256373075030.001211145381643620.00816491172950415
GATA3#2625320.42738726790450.0001924415576258320.00231949265284296
HNF4A#3172211.56614518147680.01057585681762490.0390652864885029
IRF4#3662316.43588451505810.0003669431395554610.0036574894590602
JUND#372735.245997956403270.01043432751748420.0386793047348099
MAX#414934.839416631755340.01315737137836840.0466111295202135
RAD21#588537.766275421592250.0033411193858720.0172658667759073
SMC3#9126311.28369963369960.001115802366868050.00765608589404985
SPI1#668836.153242631392040.006580387113059030.028096854035191
TCF12#693837.975848676639820.003090920396013070.0162757202399521
ZNF143#7702310.12565741417090.001534861610688180.00976363818727393
ZNF263#1012748.221841637010680.0002187871180958320.00248503619649925



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.