Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3236: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{Coexpression_clusters |full_id=C3236_Mesenchymal_Endothelial_Smooth_Hair_Fibroblast_Preadipocyte_Renal |id=C3236 }}")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{{Coexpression_clusters
|full_id=C3236_Mesenchymal_Endothelial_Smooth_Hair_Fibroblast_Preadipocyte_Renal
|full_id=C3236_Mesenchymal_Endothelial_Smooth_Hair_Fibroblast_Preadipocyte_Renal
|gostat_on_coexpression_clusters=GO:0042134!rRNA primary transcript binding!0.00571041708603294!284119$GO:0006361!transcription initiation from RNA polymerase I promoter!0.00571041708603294!284119$GO:0003716!RNA polymerase I transcription termination factor activity!0.00571041708603294!284119$GO:0003715!transcription termination factor activity!0.00856512133858862!284119$GO:0006353!transcription termination!0.011990110916016!284119$GO:0006360!transcription from RNA polymerase I promoter!0.0142726809766186!284119$GO:0016599!caveolar membrane!0.0225641601782574!284119$GO:0043624!cellular protein complex disassembly!0.0225641601782574!284119$GO:0043241!protein complex disassembly!0.0225641601782574!284119$GO:0032984!macromolecular complex disassembly!0.0225641601782574!284119$GO:0005901!caveola!0.0225641601782574!284119$GO:0019843!rRNA binding!0.025671166149659!284119$GO:0022411!cellular component disassembly!0.0322411709060457!284119
|id=C3236
|id=C3236
}}
}}

Revision as of 17:38, 18 May 2012


Full id: C3236_Mesenchymal_Endothelial_Smooth_Hair_Fibroblast_Preadipocyte_Renal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr12:109915098..109915131,-p1@KCTD10
Hg19::chr17:40575264..40575282,-p1@PTRF
Hg19::chr20:35090158..35090240,+p2@DLGAP4


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0042134rRNA primary transcript binding0.00571041708603294
GO:0006361transcription initiation from RNA polymerase I promoter0.00571041708603294
GO:0003716RNA polymerase I transcription termination factor activity0.00571041708603294
GO:0003715transcription termination factor activity0.00856512133858862
GO:0006353transcription termination0.011990110916016
GO:0006360transcription from RNA polymerase I promoter0.0142726809766186
GO:0016599caveolar membrane0.0225641601782574
GO:0043624cellular protein complex disassembly0.0225641601782574
GO:0043241protein complex disassembly0.0225641601782574
GO:0032984macromolecular complex disassembly0.0225641601782574
GO:0005901caveola0.0225641601782574
GO:0019843rRNA binding0.025671166149659
GO:0022411cellular component disassembly0.0322411709060457



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen

Disease
Ontology termp-valuen


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.