Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3595

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 21:29, 22 January 2013 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3595_acute_Mast_parietal_chronic_placenta_choriocarcinoma_Neutrophils



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr16:85589286..85589316,+p@chr16:85589286..85589316
+
Hg19::chr16:85589318..85589348,+p@chr16:85589318..85589348
+
Hg19::chr16:85589349..85589370,+p@chr16:85589349..85589370
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system1.97e-1998
blood island1.97e-1998
hemolymphoid system9.47e-15108
bone marrow2.21e-1376
bone element7.95e-1382
immune system4.13e-1093
skeletal element4.98e-1090
adult organism1.92e-07114
skeletal system3.12e-07100
blood6.45e-0715
haemolymphatic fluid6.45e-0715
organism substance6.45e-0715
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
myeloid leukemia1.42e-0831
leukemia1.81e-0739


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.0471418
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.13.14798
MA0017.12.76432
MA0019.12.26702
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.10.658629
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.11.89908
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.341392
MA0050.13.16043
MA0051.12.15619
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.10.190716
MA0056.10
MA0057.15.37342
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.10.456531
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.17.21
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.111.3342
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.10.257905
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.10.31555
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.11.35563
MA0115.13.45103
MA0116.10.560723
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.12.53618
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.10.273764
MA0146.10.107247
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.20.757898
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.20.476938
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.20.491226
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.20.264678
MA0065.20.760954
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.312019
MA0155.10.256269
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.455568
MA0163.12.48891
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.216.9941
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.11.40979
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CCNT2#90536.336201576962630.003930750035764890.0189767301338348
CEBPB#105137.971147625824820.001974187055288560.0115114802002837
CHD2#1106310.34402283411690.0009033701102746880.00659723592384995
EP300#203336.77394172622320.003216880500103790.0167297969599811
FOS#235338.99795530889440.001372499272417130.00896562744007834
GATA2#2624312.7449317335540.0004829527704283790.00436702202517485
GTF2B#2959331.94382993432423.06634405746243e-050.000627441040394434
HDAC2#3066313.41562023662630.0004140761399857210.00390762609415096
HMGN3#932438.178547723350590.001827766942164210.0108602236828064
JUN#3725312.51282919233630.0005103313992726250.00443747406615883
JUNB#3726330.61063265982113.4847716247536e-050.000679891768573961
JUND#372736.994663941871030.002921845042734990.0156521632344173
RAD21#5885310.35503389545630.0009004912073565420.00663326288652207
SMARCA4#65973156.7659033078882.58908533335753e-071.33994788469042e-05
SMARCB1#6598318.25271578115740.000164397760679890.00202877676091776
SMARCC1#6599343.66335931963151.20046018043203e-050.000301526841712701
STAT2#6773365.26377118644073.59360517547754e-060.000118245913963988
TAL1#6886219.91241111829350.003287176608740550.0170115176572149
YY1#752834.911170749853860.008441455341808260.0328838923701273



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.