Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3668

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:39, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3668_Mallassezderived_Prostate_Urothelial_Bronchial_Gingival_Small_Esophageal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:6544328..6544342,+p2@TXNDC17
Hg19::chr17:6544356..6544363,+p3@TXNDC17
Hg19::chr17:6544372..6544386,+p1@TXNDC17


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
mesenchyme9.36e-15238
entire embryonic mesenchyme9.36e-15238
trunk mesenchyme7.00e-14143
trunk1.53e-13216
multilaminar epithelium1.10e-1282
somite2.08e-1183
paraxial mesoderm2.08e-1183
presomitic mesoderm2.08e-1183
presumptive segmental plate2.08e-1183
trunk paraxial mesoderm2.08e-1183
presumptive paraxial mesoderm2.08e-1183
epithelial tube1.75e-10118
dermomyotome2.04e-1070
unilaminar epithelium3.02e-10138
skeletal muscle tissue1.21e-0861
striated muscle tissue1.21e-0861
myotome1.21e-0861
muscle tissue5.80e-0863
musculature5.80e-0863
musculature of body5.80e-0863
vasculature1.33e-0779
vascular system1.33e-0779
multi-tissue structure1.44e-07347
subdivision of trunk4.50e-07113
artery5.06e-0742
arterial blood vessel5.06e-0742
arterial system5.06e-0742


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.