Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3687

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 07:38, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3687_Pericytes_Burkitt_NK_hereditary_hepatocellular_B_hairy



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:75446607..75446628,+p27@SEPT9
Hg19::chr17:75446629..75446671,+p10@SEPT9
Hg19::chr17:75446672..75446686,+p18@SEPT9


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
nongranular leukocyte7.19e-27119
leukocyte1.74e-25140
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell9.71e-23124
lymphocyte3.26e-1953
common lymphoid progenitor3.26e-1953
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.11e-1852
hematopoietic cell3.03e-18182
hematopoietic stem cell3.44e-16172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell3.44e-16172
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell8.25e-15165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell8.25e-15165
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte2.93e-1142
lymphocyte of B lineage7.31e-1124
pro-B cell7.31e-1124
T cell3.98e-0925
pro-T cell3.98e-0925
classical monocyte4.00e-0945
monopoietic cell2.97e-0863
monocyte2.97e-0863
monoblast2.97e-0863
promonocyte2.97e-0863
mature alpha-beta T cell8.16e-0818
alpha-beta T cell8.16e-0818
immature T cell8.16e-0818
mature T cell8.16e-0818
immature alpha-beta T cell8.16e-0818
myeloid leukocyte1.04e-0776
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.39e-0765
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.49e-0770
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell2.26e-0771
melanocyte6.92e-0710
melanoblast6.92e-0710
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system2.46e-13102
blood island2.46e-13102
hemolymphoid system4.18e-13112
immune system4.97e-09115
blood1.20e-0715
haemolymphatic fluid1.20e-0715
organism substance1.20e-0715


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
EBF1#187938.9064668465690.00141523283560980.00914581412773048
EGR1#195834.988179094810140.008056488137383440.0320366876553529
FOS#235338.99795530889440.001372499272417130.00897067723336708
FOSL1#8061339.7135797163731.59554825631833e-050.000370964969594012
FOSL2#2355316.93020060456170.0002060162053171620.00242900501999538
HDAC2#3066313.41562023662630.0004140761399857210.00391045284238798
HNF4A#3172323.13229036295378.07584663437677e-050.0012277050169544
HNF4G#3174328.75342252644684.20470658818262e-050.000756477780126106
IRF1#365937.63716375356390.002244692747297240.0127958880975371
JUN#3725312.51282919233630.0005103313992726250.00443932208967464
JUNB#3726330.61063265982113.4847716247536e-050.000680145886222466
JUND#372736.994663941871030.002921845042734990.0156618032446212
NR2C2#7182332.61461090524092.88098172333076e-050.000604797688850134
SIN3A#2594235.408884726815140.006318961977991520.027641720210239
ZBTB7A#5134137.35190930787590.002516255860282270.014006035590898



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.