Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3894

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:25, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3894_CD14_immature_Eosinophils_Basophils_CD34_Mast_Whole



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:162317723..162317724,+p@chr1:162317723..162317724
+
Hg19::chr1:173991614..173991629,+p3@ENST00000424181
Hg19::chr1:173991633..173991655,+p2@ENST00000424181


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic stem cell8.19e-30168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell8.19e-30168
hematopoietic cell1.58e-28177
myeloid cell5.13e-28108
common myeloid progenitor5.13e-28108
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.72e-27161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.72e-27161
classical monocyte1.36e-2642
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.36e-2642
leukocyte9.29e-26136
myeloid leukocyte8.19e-2472
defensive cell5.20e-2348
phagocyte5.20e-2348
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell2.52e-2267
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor4.35e-2161
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.23e-2066
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell5.81e-20120
monopoietic cell6.96e-2059
monocyte6.96e-2059
monoblast6.96e-2059
promonocyte6.96e-2059
nongranular leukocyte2.26e-19115
stuff accumulating cell2.44e-0887
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system9.88e-2598
blood island9.88e-2598
hemolymphoid system3.41e-24108
bone marrow7.06e-2176
immune system1.84e-1993
bone element2.83e-1982
skeletal element4.10e-1790
skeletal system9.61e-14100
lateral plate mesoderm1.59e-07203


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
FOSL2#2355211.28680040304110.0100534586973120.0376766604309087
GTF2B#2959221.29588662288280.002878180589911410.0155829083789402
NR3C1#290829.982015554115360.01278474365547170.0460438581548953
SMARCB1#6598212.16847718743830.008675002221921740.0329913537635746
TFAP2A#7020211.01242291536330.01054990655215560.0390191122034345



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.