Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C823


Revision as of 05:29, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

Full id: C823_Fibroblast_Endothelial_hepatic_Pericytes_umbilical_Adipocyte_Lymphatic

Phase1 CAGE Peaks


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
vascular system3.52e-1378
entire embryonic mesenchyme6.18e-13160
epithelial tube1.02e-12117
circulatory system6.17e-12112
cardiovascular system1.28e-11109
epithelial vesicle3.25e-1078
excretory tube1.05e-0916
kidney epithelium1.05e-0916
nephron epithelium1.06e-0915
renal tubule1.06e-0915
nephron tubule1.06e-0915
uriniferous tubule1.06e-0915
nephrogenic mesenchyme1.06e-0915
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm4.01e-0983
muscle tissue7.48e-0964
musculature of body7.48e-0964
skeletal muscle tissue7.64e-0962
striated muscle tissue7.64e-0962
trunk mesenchyme9.90e-09122
cortex of kidney1.49e-0712
renal parenchyma1.49e-0712
compound organ1.65e-0768
organism subdivision2.15e-07264
dense mesenchyme tissue4.11e-0773
epithelial tube open at both ends4.66e-0759
blood vessel4.66e-0759
blood vasculature4.66e-0759
vascular cord4.66e-0759
presomitic mesoderm4.98e-0771
presumptive segmental plate4.98e-0771
trunk paraxial mesoderm4.98e-0771
unilaminar epithelium6.69e-07148
primitive nephron9.30e-077
renal glomerulus9.30e-077
renal corpuscle9.30e-077
glomerular capsule9.30e-077
metanephric mesenchyme9.30e-077
glomerular tuft9.30e-077
S-shaped body9.30e-077
renal vesicle9.30e-077
comma-shaped body9.30e-077
paraxial mesoderm9.36e-0772
presumptive paraxial mesoderm9.36e-0772

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.