Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1529

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 17:02, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr10:75573701..75573707,-p1@Slc5a4b
Mm9::chr14:123304330..123304342,-p@chr14:123304330..123304342
-
Mm9::chr3:122574491..122574500,-p@chr3:122574491..122574500
-
Mm9::chr3:122574540..122574567,-p@chr3:122574540..122574567
-
Mm9::chr4:21699556..21699564,-p@chr4:21699556..21699564
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
intestine2.25e-3731
mucosa1.39e-3115
intestinal mucosa1.17e-2513
anatomical wall1.17e-2513
wall of intestine1.17e-2513
gastrointestinal system mucosa1.17e-2513
gastrointestinal system1.96e-2347
organ component layer6.63e-1924
small intestine2.30e-144
epithelium of mucosa2.29e-139
gastrointestinal system epithelium2.29e-139
intestinal epithelium2.29e-139
ileal mucosa1.59e-113
ileum1.59e-113
mucosa of small intestine1.59e-113
wall of small intestine1.59e-113
simple columnar epithelium7.77e-1111
digestive system2.02e-09116
digestive tract2.02e-09116
primitive gut2.02e-09116
endoderm-derived structure3.42e-09118
endoderm3.42e-09118
presumptive endoderm3.42e-09118
gut-associated lymphoid tissue1.21e-072
mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue1.21e-072
lymphoid tissue1.21e-072
subdivision of digestive tract1.70e-07114


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}