Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1543

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 17:03, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr11:102269213..102269227,-p12@Slc25a39
Mm9::chr15:82612609..82612614,-p1@ENSMUST00000075786
Mm9::chr16:35932853..35932864,-p@chr16:35932853..35932864
-
Mm9::chr16:44061582..44061592,-p@chr16:44061582..44061592
-
Mm9::chr16:44061594..44061597,-p@chr16:44061594..44061597
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
metabolising cell3.79e-135
endopolyploid cell3.79e-135
parenchymal cell3.79e-135
polyploid cell3.79e-135
hepatocyte3.79e-135

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
liver8.03e-3422
epithelial sac8.03e-3422
digestive gland8.03e-3422
epithelium of foregut-midgut junction8.03e-3422
anatomical boundary8.03e-3422
hepatobiliary system8.03e-3422
foregut-midgut junction8.03e-3422
hepatic diverticulum8.03e-3422
liver primordium8.03e-3422
septum transversum8.03e-3422
liver bud8.03e-3422
digestive tract diverticulum3.04e-3223
sac3.04e-3223
exocrine gland1.82e-2925
exocrine system1.82e-2925
trunk mesenchyme1.52e-1745
abdomen element6.90e-1649
abdominal segment element6.90e-1649
abdominal segment of trunk6.90e-1649
abdomen6.90e-1649
epithelial tube1.75e-1447
endocrine gland1.81e-1260
mesenchyme3.21e-1261
entire embryonic mesenchyme3.21e-1261
gut epithelium5.32e-1255
gland2.69e-1165
subdivision of trunk4.40e-1166
foregut4.91e-1080
endocrine system6.29e-1072
unilaminar epithelium1.44e-0966
endo-epithelium4.87e-0969
trunk region element8.41e-0979
immaterial anatomical entity1.45e-0779
trunk2.19e-0790


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}