Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3246

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 22:37, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr1:173349095..173349100,+p3@Tstd1
Mm9::chr1:173349158..173349183,+p2@Tstd1
Mm9::chr1:173349191..173349223,+p1@Tstd1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
digestive system2.96e-19116
digestive tract2.96e-19116
primitive gut2.96e-19116
endoderm-derived structure1.46e-18118
endoderm1.46e-18118
presumptive endoderm1.46e-18118
subdivision of digestive tract1.26e-17114
intestine3.94e-1631
mucosa1.37e-1515
gastrointestinal system3.23e-1547
intestinal mucosa1.77e-1313
anatomical wall1.77e-1313
wall of intestine1.77e-1313
gastrointestinal system mucosa1.77e-1313
digestive tract diverticulum6.38e-1223
sac6.38e-1223
liver5.09e-1122
epithelial sac5.09e-1122
digestive gland5.09e-1122
epithelium of foregut-midgut junction5.09e-1122
anatomical boundary5.09e-1122
hepatobiliary system5.09e-1122
foregut-midgut junction5.09e-1122
hepatic diverticulum5.09e-1122
liver primordium5.09e-1122
septum transversum5.09e-1122
liver bud5.09e-1122
simple columnar epithelium1.03e-1011
gut epithelium1.73e-1055
endo-epithelium4.99e-1069
epithelium of mucosa9.76e-109
gastrointestinal system epithelium9.76e-109
intestinal epithelium9.76e-109
exocrine gland5.75e-0925
exocrine system5.75e-0925
unilaminar epithelium2.11e-0866
organ component layer1.26e-0724
trunk region element4.53e-0779
immaterial anatomical entity5.42e-0779


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}