Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C785

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C785_basal_mesenchymal_chorionic_leiomyoma_mesodermal_Fibroblast_Mesothelial



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:69686723..69686726,-p@chr10:69686723..69686726
-
Hg19::chr10:92754444..92754453,+p3@ENST00000412362
Hg19::chr13:38109071..38109077,+p1@FLJ34747
Hg19::chr17:39264496..39264528,+p@chr17:39264496..39264528
+
Hg19::chr22:33258742..33258764,+p@chr22:33258742..33258764
+
Hg19::chr2:217529087..217529099,+p@chr2:217529087..217529099
+
Hg19::chr4:73248974..73249005,+p@chr4:73248974..73249005
+
Hg19::chr4:75180763..75180777,+p@chr4:75180763..75180777
+
Hg19::chr5:11385554..11385566,-p28@CTNND2
Hg19::chr5:11385573..11385583,-p47@CTNND2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0007158neuron adhesion0.00947839397150595



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
receptor cell1.64e-336
sensory epithelial cell1.64e-336
olfactory epithelial cell1.64e-336
neurecto-epithelial cell1.40e-1020
columnar/cuboidal epithelial cell5.37e-0827
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
spleen1.30e-083
gastrointestinal system mesentery1.30e-083
stomach region1.30e-083
mesentery1.30e-083
gastrointestinal system serosa1.30e-083
mesentery of stomach1.30e-083
gut mesentery1.30e-083
dorsal mesentery1.30e-083
dorsal mesogastrium1.30e-083
peritoneal cavity1.30e-083
spleen primordium1.30e-083
zone of skin6.50e-074
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
basal cell carcinoma1.07e-231
spindle cell sarcoma2.62e-231
skin carcinoma1.48e-122
skin cancer1.48e-122
integumentary system cancer1.48e-122


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.00190472
MA0004.10.380329
MA0006.10.236135
MA0007.10.363007
MA0009.10.828613
MA0014.10.0216849
MA0017.10.744788
MA0019.10.520264
MA0024.10.725404
MA0025.10.960689
MA0027.12.43535
MA0028.10.25013
MA0029.10.744375
MA0030.10.733118
MA0031.10.669876
MA0038.10.477043
MA0040.10.750125
MA0041.11.02846
MA0042.10.963243
MA0043.10.828925
MA0046.10.817858
MA0048.10.830349
MA0050.10.368721
MA0051.10.473017
MA0052.10.753928
MA0055.10.0662377
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.211138
MA0058.10.293055
MA0059.10.291897
MA0060.10.138988
MA0061.10.118318
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.477449
MA0067.11.1435
MA0068.11.05557
MA0069.10.814052
MA0070.10.803003
MA0071.10.440254
MA0072.10.798564
MA0073.10.0824235
MA0074.10.4723
MA0076.10.307383
MA0077.10.790956
MA0078.10.568317
MA0081.10.292043
MA0083.11.95087
MA0084.11.32998
MA0087.10.79615
MA0088.10.0309101
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.320494
MA0091.10.382762
MA0092.10.347826
MA0093.10.238771
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.49029
MA0101.10.241637
MA0103.10.228129
MA0105.10.0508589
MA0106.10.516528
MA0107.10.179177
MA0108.20.666881
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.33284
MA0113.10.532314
MA0114.10.998594
MA0115.11.06753
MA0116.10.182037
MA0117.10.865782
MA0119.10.277531
MA0122.10.891407
MA0124.11.0263
MA0125.10.942948
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.585907
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.10.858623
MA0136.11.21476
MA0139.10.353333
MA0140.10.437738
MA0141.11.43869
MA0142.10.638837
MA0143.10.532484
MA0144.10.163394
MA0145.10.332712
MA0146.10.00275056
MA0147.10.184931
MA0148.11.83679
MA0149.10.428597
MA0062.20.114378
MA0035.20.437071
MA0039.20.0721026
MA0138.20.569505
MA0002.20.407187
MA0137.20.255808
MA0104.20.138396
MA0047.20.504873
MA0112.20.133417
MA0065.20.615279
MA0150.10.315136
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.443956
MA0153.10.926242
MA0154.10.414714
MA0155.10.12484
MA0156.11.31919
MA0157.10.612166
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.185458
MA0160.10.417847
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.00711618
MA0163.10.0235237
MA0164.10.544294
MA0080.21.24809
MA0018.20.517858
MA0099.20.444294
MA0079.20.0179307
MA0102.21.36707
MA0258.10.155735
MA0259.10.191914
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.