MCL coexpression mm9:2840

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

	Short description
Mm9::chr13:40955296..40955358,+	p2@Gcnt2
Mm9::chr1:164828526..164828587,-	p2@Fmo2
Mm9::chr1:164828616..164828629,-	p6@Fmo2

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

GO ID	GO name	FDR corrected p-value
GO:0008109	N-acetyllactosaminide beta-1,6-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase activity	0.0100802585578534
GO:0004499	flavin-containing monooxygenase activity	0.0125992876394286
GO:0016709	oxidoreductase activity, acting on paired donors, with incorporation or reduction of molecular oxygen, NADH or NADPH as one donor, and incorporation of one atom of oxygen	0.0302175791768651
GO:0006800	oxygen and reactive oxygen species metabolic process	0.0302175791768651
GO:0008375	acetylglucosaminyltransferase activity	0.0302175791768651
GO:0050660	FAD binding	0.0494838805499365

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:

---

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>

---

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n
trunk	3.93e-21	90
trunk region element	7.99e-18	79
subdivision of trunk	2.99e-12	66
mesenchyme	7.62e-10	61
entire embryonic mesenchyme	7.62e-10	61
immaterial anatomical entity	1.88e-08	79
trunk mesenchyme	6.59e-08	45
renal system	1.33e-07	19
organism subdivision	1.81e-07	150
urinary system structure	2.48e-07	18
abdomen element	5.03e-07	49
abdominal segment element	5.03e-07	49
abdominal segment of trunk	5.03e-07	49
abdomen	5.03e-07	49

TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}