MCL coexpression mm9:380

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

	Short description
Mm9::chr11:102146246..102146347,+	p1@Tmub2
Mm9::chr11:55274633..55274658,-	p1@Atox1
Mm9::chr11:69805085..69805132,+	p1@Gabarap
Mm9::chr19:4097369..4097386,+	p4@Cdk2ap2
Mm9::chr19:4097392..4097415,+	p2@Cdk2ap2
Mm9::chr2:24790668..24790735,-	p1@Arrdc1
Mm9::chr3:146162669..146162728,+	p3@Gm13342 p3@Gm15776 p3@Gm4356 p3@Gng5 p3@LOC100048410
Mm9::chr3:146162792..146162807,+	p2@Gm13342 p2@Gm15776 p2@Gm4356 p2@Gng5 p2@LOC100048410
Mm9::chr4:43676803..43676819,+	p1@ENSMUST00000056074
Mm9::chr4:63205833..63205887,+	p1@Atp6v1g1
Mm9::chr5:137437951..137437999,+	p1@Fis1
Mm9::chr5:8056536..8056551,+	p2@Sri
Mm9::chr6:72340479..72340577,-	p1@Vamp8
Mm9::chr7:148578063..148578112,+	p1@Taldo1
Mm9::chr7:27963854..27963907,-	p1@Rab4b
Mm9::chr7:31347956..31347972,-	p@chr7:31347956..31347972 -
Mm9::chr7:3293028..3293062,+	p5@Myadm
Mm9::chr7:3644508..3644634,-	p1@Mboat7
Mm9::chr8:3621529..3621583,+	p1@2900053A13Rik
Mm9::chr9:72887520..72887550,+	p1@2310009A05Rik

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:

---

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>

---

Cell Type

Ontology term	p-value	n
epithelial cell	5.38e-08	25

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n
intestine	1.07e-09	31
gastrointestinal system	1.42e-09	47
mucosa	6.36e-09	15
organ component layer	1.77e-08	24
musculoskeletal system	6.44e-08	32
intestinal mucosa	8.83e-08	13
anatomical wall	8.83e-08	13
wall of intestine	8.83e-08	13
gastrointestinal system mucosa	8.83e-08	13

TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}