Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2631

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:15, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2631_chronic_pineal_gall_teratocarcinoma_testicular_choriocarcinoma_cholangiocellular



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr21:39493435..39493461,-p1@DSCR4
Hg19::chr21:39493560..39493573,+p2@DSCR8
Hg19::chr21:39493574..39493607,+p1@DSCR8
Hg19::chr21:39493611..39493629,+p3@DSCR8


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
pigment epithelium of eye9.50e-1311
sense organ1.24e-1124
sensory system1.24e-1124
entire sense organ system1.24e-1124
atypical epithelium4.83e-104
eye2.09e-0921
visual system2.09e-0921
acellular anatomical structure8.82e-093
egg chorion8.82e-093
camera-type eye4.56e-0820
simple eye4.56e-0820
immature eye4.56e-0820
ocular region4.56e-0820
eyeball of camera-type eye4.56e-0820
optic cup4.56e-0820
optic vesicle4.56e-0820
eye primordium4.56e-0820
ciliary epithelium6.42e-083
ciliary body6.42e-083
anterior segment of eyeball1.55e-0714
face3.48e-0722
anterior region of body9.88e-0762
craniocervical region9.88e-0762
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
chronic leukemia1.90e-088


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
ELF1#199744.258097958807540.003041525565781240.0161033097721092
FOS#235348.99795530889440.0001525147711168630.00195058660062136
GTF2B#2959431.94382993432429.59435337635006e-074.09156664872448e-05
GTF2F1#2962412.73966087675773.79492332235515e-050.000718784905446953
HEY1#2346244.040111043105710.00375304636917980.0186294871554548
IRF1#365947.63716375356390.0002938853996185490.00307792792326129
JUND#372746.994663941871030.000417684217818580.003919716239083
MXI1#460149.96157162875930.0001015224754950450.00142550495001707
NFYA#4800418.42558069983058.67100748407158e-060.000234730780360019
NFYB#4801416.75979325353651.26678572070404e-050.00031159169544185
REST#597849.650028716128020.0001152825614219170.00157241679931352
SIRT6#515484153.6384039900251.78585744852249e-091.55427638388534e-07
SP2#6668426.15353049384462.13562021071447e-067.74989712254374e-05
TAF1#687243.343046285745290.008005664898701650.032263308367953
TAL1#6886429.86861667744021.25525650806991e-065.04416061740335e-05
TBP#690843.706770687096390.005296377814784350.0244550334938884



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.