Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1828

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 17:30, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr6:48791017..48791034,-p1@Tmem176b
Mm9::chr6:48791045..48791056,-p4@Tmem176b
Mm9::chr6:48791071..48791094,-p2@Tmem176b
Mm9::chr6:48791475..48791552,+p1@Tmem176a
Mm9::chr6:48791556..48791567,+p2@Tmem176a


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
trunk5.93e-1790
trunk region element2.94e-1579
subdivision of trunk3.89e-1566
mesenchyme9.68e-1261
entire embryonic mesenchyme9.68e-1261
trunk mesenchyme9.87e-1145
abdomen element2.86e-1049
abdominal segment element2.86e-1049
abdominal segment of trunk2.86e-1049
abdomen2.86e-1049
immaterial anatomical entity2.50e-0979
exocrine gland3.30e-0925
exocrine system3.30e-0925
liver1.55e-0722
epithelial sac1.55e-0722
digestive gland1.55e-0722
epithelium of foregut-midgut junction1.55e-0722
anatomical boundary1.55e-0722
hepatobiliary system1.55e-0722
foregut-midgut junction1.55e-0722
hepatic diverticulum1.55e-0722
liver primordium1.55e-0722
septum transversum1.55e-0722
liver bud1.55e-0722
digestive tract diverticulum2.56e-0723
sac2.56e-0723
epithelial tube5.71e-0747
digestive system7.30e-07116
digestive tract7.30e-07116
primitive gut7.30e-07116
epithelial fold7.56e-0720


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}