Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1270

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:47, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1270_papillotubular_gall_epidermoid_mucinous_trachea_throat_colon



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr3:195515602..195515617,-p@chr3:195515602..195515617
-
Hg19::chr3:195516015..195516027,-p@chr3:195516015..195516027
-
Hg19::chr3:195538743..195538754,-p2@MUC4
Hg19::chr3:195538762..195538775,-p3@MUC4
Hg19::chr3:195538781..195538786,-p5@MUC4
Hg19::chr3:195538787..195538810,-p1@MUC4
Hg19::chr3:195538833..195538847,-p4@MUC4


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
germ line cell6.04e-137
germ cell6.04e-137
placental epithelial cell1.09e-073
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
endoderm-derived structure7.40e-14160
endoderm7.40e-14160
presumptive endoderm7.40e-14160
subdivision of digestive tract3.55e-12118
reproductive organ3.65e-1148
digestive system8.19e-11145
digestive tract8.19e-11145
primitive gut8.19e-11145
placenta1.51e-094
allantois1.51e-094
reproductive structure2.82e-0959
reproductive system2.82e-0959
anatomical space5.47e-0995
internal female genitalia3.31e-0822
embryonic uterus3.52e-0822
respiratory tract5.58e-0854
immaterial anatomical entity1.06e-07117
male reproductive organ1.71e-0711
testis1.71e-078
extraembryonic membrane2.64e-0714
membranous layer2.64e-0714
respiratory system3.86e-0774
intestine4.42e-0717
uterus5.45e-0721
internal genitalia5.56e-0725
pharynx5.99e-0711
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
carcinoma4.86e-10106
squamous cell carcinoma3.34e-0914
cell type cancer1.06e-07143


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.