Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:548

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:32, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr10:119645795..119645837,+p2@Tmbim4
Mm9::chr10:80568678..80568749,+p1@Map2k2
Mm9::chr10:80730952..80731015,+p1@Apba3
Mm9::chr15:89259764..89259782,-p5@Chkb
Mm9::chr19:5875268..5875279,-p2@Frmd8
Mm9::chr2:25413381..25413443,+p1@Edf1
p1@Gm11964
Mm9::chr5:136220066..136220074,-p3@Tmem120a
Mm9::chr5:136220076..136220141,-p1@Tmem120a
Mm9::chr8:125736642..125736679,-p1@Chmp1a
Mm9::chr8:125736680..125736689,-p2@Chmp1a
Mm9::chr8:73895182..73895258,+p1@Ocel1
Mm9::chr9:107436331..107436355,+p2@Tmem115
Mm9::chr9:57408741..57408796,+p1@Scamp2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
embryonic cell7.56e-1370
somatic cell9.64e-12118
animal cell7.27e-11115
eukaryotic cell7.27e-11115
epithelial cell8.07e-1025
endodermal cell2.13e-0820

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
intestine8.66e-1131
mucosa9.69e-0915
intestinal mucosa1.49e-0713
anatomical wall1.49e-0713
wall of intestine1.49e-0713
gastrointestinal system mucosa1.49e-0713


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}