Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:715

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:47, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr11:75252977..75252988,-p3@Serpinf2
Mm9::chr18:63851871..63851882,-p8@Txnl1
Mm9::chr19:55201670..55201733,-p2@Gpam
Mm9::chr19:55201737..55201747,-p7@Gpam
Mm9::chr1:191993385..191993405,-p3@Prox1
Mm9::chr4:53156896..53156909,-p@chr4:53156896..53156909
-
Mm9::chr4:53156932..53156960,-p@chr4:53156932..53156960
-
Mm9::chr4:53156963..53156983,-p@chr4:53156963..53156983
-
Mm9::chr9:110892955..110892970,-p@chr9:110892955..110892970
-
Mm9::chr9:83148047..83148062,-p@chr9:83148047..83148062
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0004366glycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase activity0.0294286461931374
GO:0006644phospholipid metabolic process0.0294286461931374
GO:0045332phospholipid translocation0.0294286461931374
GO:0006643membrane lipid metabolic process0.0294286461931374
GO:0033344cholesterol efflux0.0385563249146321
GO:0001945lymph vessel development0.0401584375282003



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
liver7.65e-2022
epithelial sac7.65e-2022
digestive gland7.65e-2022
epithelium of foregut-midgut junction7.65e-2022
anatomical boundary7.65e-2022
hepatobiliary system7.65e-2022
foregut-midgut junction7.65e-2022
hepatic diverticulum7.65e-2022
liver primordium7.65e-2022
septum transversum7.65e-2022
liver bud7.65e-2022
digestive tract diverticulum1.46e-1823
sac1.46e-1823
exocrine gland8.98e-1825
exocrine system8.98e-1825
abdomen element2.50e-1649
abdominal segment element2.50e-1649
abdominal segment of trunk2.50e-1649
abdomen2.50e-1649
trunk region element8.01e-1379
subdivision of trunk1.19e-1266
trunk mesenchyme1.31e-1245
mesenchyme3.25e-1161
entire embryonic mesenchyme3.25e-1161
trunk2.14e-0990
epithelial tube2.23e-0847


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}