Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1764

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 17:24, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr2:12223521..12223530,-p3@Itga8
Mm9::chr2:12223541..12223549,-p2@Itga8
Mm9::chr2:12223561..12223614,-p1@Itga8
Mm9::chr2:12223615..12223618,-p5@Itga8
Mm9::chr2:12223623..12223632,-p4@Itga8


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
subdivision of trunk1.34e-1266
epithelial fold1.25e-0920
lung1.74e-0914
respiratory tube1.74e-0914
respiration organ1.74e-0914
pair of lungs1.74e-0914
lung primordium1.74e-0914
lung bud1.74e-0914
epithelial bud2.16e-0917
trunk2.53e-0990
trunk region element3.90e-0979
multi-cellular organism1.60e-08333
embryo6.43e-08320
abdomen element1.11e-0749
abdominal segment element1.11e-0749
abdominal segment of trunk1.11e-0749
abdomen1.11e-0749
kidney2.67e-0714
kidney mesenchyme2.67e-0714
upper urinary tract2.67e-0714
kidney rudiment2.67e-0714
kidney field2.67e-0714


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}