Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3047

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:26, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr16:4077778..4077831,-p1@Trap1
Mm9::chr3:85378031..85378070,+p1@Pet112l
Mm9::chr5:21242960..21242997,+p1@Pmpcb


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0005739mitochondrion0.00567030077247576
GO:0050567glutaminyl-tRNA synthase (glutamine-hydrolyzing) activity0.00567030077247576
GO:0004240mitochondrial processing peptidase activity0.0113393588981817
GO:0009003signal peptidase activity0.0181380042854968
GO:0016884carbon-nitrogen ligase activity, with glutamine as amido-N-donor0.0181380042854968
GO:0044267cellular protein metabolic process0.0283254649292165
GO:0044260cellular macromolecule metabolic process0.0283254649292165
GO:0019538protein metabolic process0.0283254649292165
GO:0044444cytoplasmic part0.0360214733209461



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial tube3.52e-1347
digestive tract diverticulum1.10e-1023
sac1.10e-1023
liver2.03e-1022
epithelial sac2.03e-1022
digestive gland2.03e-1022
epithelium of foregut-midgut junction2.03e-1022
anatomical boundary2.03e-1022
hepatobiliary system2.03e-1022
foregut-midgut junction2.03e-1022
hepatic diverticulum2.03e-1022
liver primordium2.03e-1022
septum transversum2.03e-1022
liver bud2.03e-1022
exocrine gland2.46e-1025
exocrine system2.46e-1025
abdomen element8.34e-0949
abdominal segment element8.34e-0949
abdominal segment of trunk8.34e-0949
abdomen8.34e-0949


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}