Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2840

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 22:01, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr13:40955296..40955358,+p2@Gcnt2
Mm9::chr1:164828526..164828587,-p2@Fmo2
Mm9::chr1:164828616..164828629,-p6@Fmo2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0008109N-acetyllactosaminide beta-1,6-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase activity0.0100802585578534
GO:0004499flavin-containing monooxygenase activity0.0125992876394286
GO:0016709oxidoreductase activity, acting on paired donors, with incorporation or reduction of molecular oxygen, NADH or NADPH as one donor, and incorporation of one atom of oxygen0.0302175791768651
GO:0006800oxygen and reactive oxygen species metabolic process0.0302175791768651
GO:0008375acetylglucosaminyltransferase activity0.0302175791768651
GO:0050660FAD binding0.0494838805499365



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
trunk3.93e-2190
trunk region element7.99e-1879
subdivision of trunk2.99e-1266
mesenchyme7.62e-1061
entire embryonic mesenchyme7.62e-1061
immaterial anatomical entity1.88e-0879
trunk mesenchyme6.59e-0845
renal system1.33e-0719
organism subdivision1.81e-07150
urinary system structure2.48e-0718
abdomen element5.03e-0749
abdominal segment element5.03e-0749
abdominal segment of trunk5.03e-0749
abdomen5.03e-0749


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}