Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2122

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:18, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2122_placenta_epididymis_thyroid_skin_amniotic_tongue_parotid



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:26593649..26593670,-p5@MUC15
Hg19::chr11:26593677..26593708,-p2@MUC15
Hg19::chr11:26593711..26593737,-p4@MUC15
Hg19::chr1:20113550..20113568,-p5@TMCO4


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
endo-epithelial cell1.06e-1442
endodermal cell2.62e-1158
acinar cell8.59e-095
epithelial cell of alimentary canal9.53e-0820
protein secreting cell3.00e-076
respiratory epithelial cell8.20e-0713
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
respiratory system4.67e-1574
saliva-secreting gland1.78e-116
gland of oral region1.78e-116
gland of foregut1.78e-116
oral gland1.78e-116
oral cavity1.78e-116
oral opening2.15e-1122
gland of gut3.02e-1110
anatomical space4.51e-1195
endoderm-derived structure4.75e-11160
endoderm4.75e-11160
presumptive endoderm4.75e-11160
orifice1.31e-1036
digestive system2.34e-10145
digestive tract2.34e-10145
primitive gut2.34e-10145
adult organism9.50e-10114
anterior region of body2.46e-0962
craniocervical region2.46e-0962
mouth3.91e-0929
stomodeum3.91e-0929
respiratory tract2.82e-0854
subdivision of digestive tract8.82e-08118
immaterial anatomical entity1.91e-07117
internal genitalia5.53e-0725
foregut8.16e-0787
male genital duct8.82e-073
internal male genitalia8.82e-073


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
POU5F1#5460183.85980036297640.01187154239091560.0432335593752993
SPI1#668836.153242631392040.006580387113059030.0280876675535709



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.