Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3943

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:57, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3943_neuroblastoma_hepatoblastoma_testicular_chronic_pineal_gastrointestinal_nonsmall



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:225117350..225117409,+p1@DNAH14
Hg19::chr1:225117410..225117417,+p6@DNAH14
Hg19::chr1:225117419..225117430,+p4@DNAH14


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial cell6.15e-16254
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
multi-tissue structure4.77e-09347
digestive system1.14e-08155
digestive tract1.14e-08155
primitive gut1.14e-08155
endoderm-derived structure7.38e-08169
endoderm7.38e-08169
presumptive endoderm7.38e-08169
anatomical space1.65e-07104
subdivision of digestive tract3.50e-07129
endodermal part of digestive tract3.50e-07129
primordium6.29e-07168
body cavity9.06e-0746
immaterial anatomical entity9.40e-07126
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
disease of cellular proliferation8.85e-34239
cell type cancer1.45e-33143
cancer1.70e-33235
carcinoma1.49e-28106
organ system cancer3.14e-10137
germ cell and embryonal cancer7.21e-0722
germ cell cancer7.21e-0722


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CCNT2#90536.336201576962630.003930750035764890.0190162869642973
CHD2#1106310.34402283411690.0009033701102746880.00660693774138503
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.032559205920425
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.0322472592369853
EGR1#195834.988179094810140.008056488137383440.0320867774312699
ELF1#199734.258097958807540.01295179875054610.0462642078701786
EP300#203336.77394172622320.003216880500103790.016759005464675
GABPB1#255337.067683836182170.002832212825417420.0154219747275167
GATA1#2623313.56030814380040.0004009615963782630.00388064388510327
GATA2#2624312.7449317335540.0004829527704283790.00437042755313833
GATA3#2625327.2365163572064.94721007899563e-050.000851907128508202
GTF2F1#2962312.73966087675770.0004835525047438590.00434199467311013
MAX#414936.452555509007120.003721913834265510.0186683776263978
MYC#460935.22228187160940.007020843755740150.0294726436354253
NRF1#4899312.21027944771090.0005492172401020010.00471359185956224
SETDB1#9869340.32002617801051.52461559299059e-050.000358947988990857
SIN3A#2594235.408884726815140.006318961977991520.0276997301162416
STAT1#6772320.70658749719920.0001125992441046670.00154957866056757
STAT3#6774310.51946499715420.0008589184530415310.00642997522164751
TAF7#6879311.43306940492390.0006690181981945830.0054340948515511
THAP1#55145331.36914460285133.23800758564397e-050.000647223491362815
USF1#739136.361499277207960.00388404057290560.0190408051724412
YY1#752834.911170749853860.008441455341808260.0329650446620966
ZBTB7A#5134137.35190930787590.002516255860282270.0140322109030339



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.