Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3090

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:30, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr17:32822530..32822541,+p2@Cyp4f15
Mm9::chr17:32822555..32822560,+p4@Cyp4f15
Mm9::chr3:120980046..120980060,-p@chr3:120980046..120980060
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
metabolising cell2.98e-085
endopolyploid cell2.98e-085
parenchymal cell2.98e-085
polyploid cell2.98e-085
hepatocyte2.98e-085

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
exocrine gland3.13e-2625
exocrine system3.13e-2625
liver3.27e-2522
epithelial sac3.27e-2522
digestive gland3.27e-2522
epithelium of foregut-midgut junction3.27e-2522
anatomical boundary3.27e-2522
hepatobiliary system3.27e-2522
foregut-midgut junction3.27e-2522
hepatic diverticulum3.27e-2522
liver primordium3.27e-2522
septum transversum3.27e-2522
liver bud3.27e-2522
digestive tract diverticulum7.99e-2423
sac7.99e-2423
trunk mesenchyme1.74e-1245
abdomen element1.51e-1049
abdominal segment element1.51e-1049
abdominal segment of trunk1.51e-1049
abdomen1.51e-1049
gut epithelium5.72e-0955
gland8.22e-0965
epithelial tube1.77e-0847
endocrine gland3.28e-0860
mesenchyme3.34e-0861
entire embryonic mesenchyme3.34e-0861
endocrine system5.59e-0872
trunk region element1.80e-0779
subdivision of trunk7.36e-0766


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}