Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4420

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4420_colon_Hepatocyte_placenta_mesothelioma_liver_lung_amniotic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr4:48018580..48018602,- p5@CNGA1
Hg19::chr4:48018616..48018632,- p3@CNGA1
Hg19::chr4:48018648..48018676,- p1@CNGA1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset
data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset
data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset

cell_data
uberon_data
disease_data


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
endodermal cell7.50e-1158
endo-epithelial cell1.31e-0942
epithelial cell of alimentary canal2.69e-0820
epithelial cell4.62e-08253
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
endoderm-derived structure3.56e-16160
endoderm3.56e-16160
presumptive endoderm3.56e-16160
digestive system8.41e-15145
digestive tract8.41e-15145
primitive gut8.41e-15145
subdivision of digestive tract1.50e-13118
orifice1.75e-1336
oral opening5.18e-0922
intestine6.16e-0917
hindgut6.74e-0919
embryo7.45e-09592
reproductive structure1.02e-0759
reproductive system1.02e-0759
organ4.25e-07503
developing anatomical structure4.54e-07581
mouth6.40e-0729
stomodeum6.40e-0729
organism subdivision7.02e-07264
gastrointestinal system7.32e-0725
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
squamous cell carcinoma1.34e-1014
carcinoma3.81e-08106


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs
data

Jaspar motifs
data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.13.8806
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.13.13838
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.10.118426
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.11.58389
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.12.45333
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.11.06172
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.333427
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.12.13518
MA0061.10.456531
MA0063.10
MA0066.13.5636
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.10.405474
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.10.0185922
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.11.74184
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.10.257905
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.11.84783
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.11.52002
MA0105.10.31555
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.11.80901
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.11.35563
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.10.560723
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.10.752137
MA0146.18.04252
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.21.9924
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.21.62945
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.20.476938
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.20.491226
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.27.9226
MA0065.22.13692
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.838867
MA0155.10.711948
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.12.05956
MA0163.13.19905
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.20.311277
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.12.22591
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.0280705072797538
CTCFL#140690213.16431623931620.007433367036996010.0306911808648676
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0326953360965085
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.0323722388276704
EBF1#187938.9064668465690.00141523283560980.009182176934724
EGR1#195834.988179094810140.008056488137383440.0321911226788656
ELF1#199734.258097958807540.01295179875054610.0464213909093752
HMGN3#932438.178547723350590.001827766942164210.0109005340151147
IRF1#365937.63716375356390.002244692747297240.0128555311381321
NFYB#4801316.75979325353650.0002123649923296180.00246490191530484
RAD21#5885310.35503389545630.0009004912073565420.0066690115731889
SMC3#9126315.04493284493280.0002935825420371870.00310275927017018
STAT1#6772320.70658749719920.0001125992441046670.00155223765246136
TFAP2A#7020316.5186343730450.0002218033880766340.00249111991045656
TFAP2C#7022310.80922860986020.0007916746575753130.00617949996730255
TRIM28#10155318.59052504526250.0001555969297255280.00197645192697694
ZEB1#6935316.88843201754390.0002075486917327580.0024349784111298



Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.
Analyst:NA

link to data source
data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.