Coexpression cluster:C2947

Full id: C2947_Fibroblast_Mesenchymal_Cardiac_teratocarcinoma_Hepatic_uterus_Meningeal

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr9:94712403..94712414,-	p4@ROR2
Hg19::chr9:94712415..94712429,-	p3@ROR2
Hg19::chr9:94712434..94712472,-	p1@ROR2
Hg19::chr9:94712473..94712515,-	p2@ROR2

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>

---

Cell Type

Ontology term	p-value	n
fibroblast	5.29e-07	75
non-terminally differentiated cell	8.10e-07	180

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n
multi-tissue structure	4.15e-10	347
organ part	1.45e-08	219
endoderm-derived structure	1.86e-07	169
endoderm	1.86e-07	169
presumptive endoderm	1.86e-07	169
primordium	2.33e-07	168
organ segment	2.81e-07	97

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}

ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

---

(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF	#promoters	Enrichment	p-value	q-value
CCNT2#905	4	6.33620157696263	0.000620310058721564	0.00514000017635841
CTCF#10664	4	5.36025637307503	0.00121114538164362	0.00820782639111533
CTCFL#140690	4	19.7464743589744	6.5732084880439e-06	0.000193652840982459
E2F1#1869	4	4.90738921487932	0.00172402235736179	0.0106895731999827
E2F4#1874	4	12.6680603152844	3.88145892637771e-05	0.000728699782153446
E2F6#1876	4	5.01715573169739	0.0015780219347306	0.0099992132533266
EGR1#1958	4	4.98817909481014	0.00161501150007605	0.0101700443808528
ETS1#2113	4	9.72876092220234	0.000111595531741814	0.00154903319239544
HMGN3#9324	4	8.17854772335059	0.000223457028444047	0.00248722461831694
RAD21#5885	4	10.3550338954563	8.6948481184721e-05	0.00130190859160589
SMC3#9126	4	15.0449328449328	1.95092670935632e-05	0.000439975889869282
TAF1#6872	4	3.34304628574529	0.00800566489870165	0.0323556997157812
TBP#6908	4	3.70677068709639	0.00529637781478435	0.0245211633388715
YY1#7528	4	4.91117074985386	0.0017187183805544	0.0107145722525351
ZBTB7A#51341	4	7.3519093078759	0.00034222354001599	0.0034740945077498
ZNF263#10127	4	8.22184163701068	0.000218787118095832	0.00250245403863877

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

---

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.