Coexpression cluster:C1529

Full id: C1529_mature_Synoviocyte_skin_acute_breast_lymphoma_aorta

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr5:158526917..158526932,-	p1@EBF1
Hg19::chr5:158527104..158527135,-	p4@EBF1
Hg19::chr5:158527139..158527161,-	p5@EBF1
Hg19::chr5:158527253..158527264,-	p10@EBF1
Hg19::chr5:158527293..158527302,-	p@chr5:158527293..158527302 -
Hg19::chr5:158527316..158527339,-	p@chr5:158527316..158527339 -

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>

---

Cell Type

Ontology term	p-value	n
non-terminally differentiated cell	4.58e-11	180
fibroblast	7.81e-11	75
fat cell	1.68e-08	15

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n
adult organism	8.06e-17	115
tissue	1.27e-08	787
brain	8.22e-07	69
future brain	8.22e-07	69
regional part of nervous system	8.87e-07	94
nervous system	8.87e-07	94

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}

ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

---

(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF	#promoters	Enrichment	p-value	q-value
CCNT2#905	5	5.28016798080219	0.000510094397483253	0.00446814969208702
E2F6#1876	5	4.18096310974782	0.00157359875958697	0.00997663333045003
ELF1#1997	5	3.54841496567295	0.00344683777572169	0.0175336949227314
HMGN3#9324	5	6.81545643612549	0.000147210725358366	0.001900202811235
IRF1#3659	5	6.36430312796992	0.00020566751420509	0.00244032146285678
NFKB1#4790	5	4.5733861868282	0.0010219625937113	0.0072479119465309
NFYA#4800	5	15.3546505831921	2.69491857690925e-06	9.42896486612481e-05
NFYB#4801	5	13.966494377947	4.30822010697714e-06	0.000136182263847635
NRF1#4899	5	10.1752328730924	2.0585884796849e-05	0.000455598478978196
POU2F2#5452	5	7.58843671478544	8.70203885493171e-05	0.00129113828096351
REST#5978	5	8.04169059677335	6.54774545315482e-05	0.00106219320811127
RFX5#5993	5	10.0399256893292	2.19894173045095e-05	0.000482773334846682
SP1#6667	5	4.74865114845075	0.000852370402732661	0.00641868285319752
TAF1#6872	5	2.78587190478774	0.0107863634029041	0.0398006291490919
TBP#6908	5	3.08897557258032	0.00664544827578693	0.028291373409217
ZNF263#10127	5	6.8515346975089	0.000143460795381412	0.00186772650322105

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

---

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.