Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2064

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 17:52, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr13:31877127..31877139,+p@chr13:31877127..31877139
+
Mm9::chr3:6107491..6107503,+p@chr3:6107491..6107503
+
Mm9::chr3:6107519..6107531,+p@chr3:6107519..6107531
+
Mm9::chr3:6107532..6107554,+p@chr3:6107532..6107554
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
appendage2.93e-1112
paired limb/fin2.93e-1112
limb2.93e-1112
paired limb/fin bud2.93e-1112
limb bud2.93e-1112
limb/fin field2.93e-1112
limb field2.93e-1112
surface structure8.90e-1122
appendage girdle complex3.52e-1013
forelimb1.64e-087
pectoral appendage1.64e-087
pectoral appendage bud1.64e-087
forelimb bud1.64e-087
forelimb/pectoral fin field1.64e-087
eye4.70e-089
camera-type eye4.70e-089
simple eye4.70e-089
immature eye4.70e-089
ocular region4.70e-089
visual system4.70e-089
face4.70e-089
optic cup4.70e-089
optic vesicle4.70e-089
eye primordium4.70e-089
sense organ1.60e-0712
sensory system1.60e-0712
entire sense organ system1.60e-0712
pectoral complex2.76e-078
head8.61e-0713
ectodermal placode8.61e-0713


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}