Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3728

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 23:20, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr9:89949325..89949337,+p3@Ctsh
Mm9::chr9:89949345..89949363,+p2@Ctsh
Mm9::chr9:89949367..89949383,+p1@Ctsh


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial cell3.33e-0725
endodermal cell9.26e-0720

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
trunk2.31e-1490
subdivision of trunk1.13e-1366
trunk region element1.00e-1179
trunk mesenchyme1.59e-1145
mesenchyme5.27e-1161
entire embryonic mesenchyme5.27e-1161
abdomen element7.29e-0949
abdominal segment element7.29e-0949
abdominal segment of trunk7.29e-0949
abdomen7.29e-0949
exocrine gland1.85e-0825
exocrine system1.85e-0825
digestive system1.30e-07116
digestive tract1.30e-07116
primitive gut1.30e-07116
digestive tract diverticulum1.39e-0723
sac1.39e-0723
endoderm-derived structure1.41e-07118
endoderm1.41e-07118
presumptive endoderm1.41e-07118
liver1.70e-0722
epithelial sac1.70e-0722
digestive gland1.70e-0722
epithelium of foregut-midgut junction1.70e-0722
anatomical boundary1.70e-0722
hepatobiliary system1.70e-0722
foregut-midgut junction1.70e-0722
hepatic diverticulum1.70e-0722
liver primordium1.70e-0722
septum transversum1.70e-0722
liver bud1.70e-0722
subdivision of digestive tract7.72e-07114
immaterial anatomical entity9.42e-0779


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}