Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2551

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:25, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2551_nonsmall_neuroblastoma_retinoblastoma_carcinoid_Reticulocytes_non_mesothelioma



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:202311054..202311071,-p1@UBE2T
Hg19::chr1:202311079..202311086,-p3@UBE2T
Hg19::chr1:202311088..202311099,-p2@UBE2T
Hg19::chr1:203830938..203831001,+p3@SNRPE


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0030532small nuclear ribonucleoprotein complex0.0452854120733943
GO:0000245spliceosome assembly0.0452854120733943
GO:0000375RNA splicing, via transesterification reactions0.0452854120733943
GO:0000398nuclear mRNA splicing, via spliceosome0.0452854120733943
GO:0000377RNA splicing, via transesterification reactions with bulged adenosine as nucleophile0.0452854120733943



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial cell2.54e-17254
animal cell1.77e-15679
eukaryotic cell1.77e-15679
embryonic cell2.58e-10248
migratory neural crest cell1.17e-0941
non-terminally differentiated cell1.19e-09180
neural cell5.22e-0925
neurectodermal cell5.60e-0959
native cell1.89e-08722
ectodermal cell7.91e-0871
neuron associated cell2.55e-0717
neuron associated cell (sensu Vertebrata)2.55e-0717
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
larynx5.54e-079
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
cancer2.91e-50235
disease of cellular proliferation1.04e-49239
organ system cancer3.57e-25137
cell type cancer5.60e-24143
carcinoma5.39e-19106
hematologic cancer4.14e-1851
immune system cancer4.14e-1851
leukemia1.22e-1439
myeloid leukemia3.83e-1131


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.