Coexpression cluster:C3730

Full id: C3730_colon_stomach_pancreas_salivary_parotid_rectum_small

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr18:55470320..55470331,-	p6@ATP8B1
Hg19::chr18:55470341..55470410,-	p2@ATP8B1
Hg19::chr18:55470413..55470441,-	p3@ATP8B1

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>

---

Cell Type

Ontology term	p-value	n
epithelial cell	3.52e-12	253
endo-epithelial cell	9.32e-11	42
endodermal cell	8.28e-09	58

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n
endoderm-derived structure	4.64e-21	160
endoderm	4.64e-21	160
presumptive endoderm	4.64e-21	160
digestive system	7.95e-17	145
digestive tract	7.95e-17	145
primitive gut	7.95e-17	145
multi-cellular organism	5.92e-13	656
subdivision of digestive tract	2.74e-11	118
surface structure	3.40e-11	99
orifice	1.03e-10	36
organism subdivision	2.00e-09	264
anatomical system	4.32e-09	624
endo-epithelium	5.63e-09	82
anatomical group	5.86e-09	625
thoracic segment of trunk	1.17e-08	52
organ component layer	1.79e-08	66
anatomical space	1.86e-08	95
respiratory system	4.92e-08	74
hindgut	1.49e-07	19
immaterial anatomical entity	1.66e-07	117
reproductive structure	2.15e-07	59
reproductive system	2.15e-07	59
trunk	2.54e-07	199
extraembryonic membrane	4.32e-07	14
membranous layer	4.32e-07	14
renal system	8.98e-07	48

Disease

Ontology term	p-value	n
squamous cell carcinoma	5.11e-08	14

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}

ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

---

(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF	#promoters	Enrichment	p-value	q-value
E2F1#1869	3	4.90738921487932	0.00846098534723939	0.0325148783412567
EP300#2033	3	6.7739417262232	0.00321688050010379	0.0167406339404225
FOXA1#3169	3	11.0814197493855	0.00073475527569867	0.00581077587753243
MYC#4609	3	5.2222818716094	0.00702084375574015	0.0294336023203976
NR3C1#2908	3	14.973023331173	0.000297833119467548	0.00308830353098404
SUZ12#23512	3	50.1157809110629	7.93834897779404e-06	0.000222212068853345

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

---

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.