Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C536

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:17, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C536_Chondrocyte_Mallassezderived_liver_mesothelioma_Adipocyte_serous_tenocyte



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:73003801..73003812,+p5@P2RY6
Hg19::chr11:73003824..73003859,+p4@P2RY6
Hg19::chr12:54651599..54651610,-p40@CBX5
Hg19::chr12:57629258..57629306,-p@chr12:57629258..57629306
-
Hg19::chr1:172224417..172224440,+p@chr1:172224417..172224440
+
Hg19::chr1:172224446..172224459,+p@chr1:172224446..172224459
+
Hg19::chr1:186265353..186265386,+p2@PRG4
Hg19::chr1:186265399..186265414,+p3@PRG4
Hg19::chr1:186265958..186265975,+p1@PRG4
Hg19::chr1:186275480..186275498,+p@chr1:186275480..186275498
+
Hg19::chr1:186277186..186277192,+p@chr1:186277186..186277192
+
Hg19::chr1:203148612..203148623,-p12@CHI3L1
Hg19::chr4:71384280..71384295,+p1@AMTN
Hg19::chr4:71384300..71384314,+p2@AMTN
Hg19::chr6:44192182..44192212,+p@chr6:44192182..44192212
+
Hg19::chr7:138440637..138440651,-p6@ATP6V0A4
Hg19::chr8:37535618..37535621,+p@chr8:37535618..37535621
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0001503ossification0.00640592717668816
GO:0031214biomineral formation0.00640592717668816
GO:0046849bone remodeling0.00640592717668816
GO:0048771tissue remodeling0.00640592717668816
GO:0045029UDP-activated nucleotide receptor activity0.0109394665143773
GO:0044421extracellular region part0.0109394665143773
GO:0015065uridine nucleotide receptor activity0.0112417520314546
GO:0010369chromocenter0.0112417520314546
GO:0001501skeletal development0.0112417520314546
GO:0009888tissue development0.0187424580794987
GO:0033176proton-transporting V-type ATPase complex0.0187424580794987
GO:0016471vacuolar proton-transporting V-type ATPase complex0.0187424580794987
GO:0030321transepithelial chloride transport0.0197708084273638
GO:0031526brush border membrane0.020651913924604
GO:0031253cell projection membrane0.0209419681294724
GO:0005720nuclear heterochromatin0.0209419681294724
GO:0005578proteinaceous extracellular matrix0.0209419681294724
GO:0006032chitin catabolic process0.0209419681294724
GO:0006046N-acetylglucosamine catabolic process0.0209419681294724
GO:0006043glucosamine catabolic process0.0209419681294724
GO:0046348amino sugar catabolic process0.0209419681294724
GO:0006030chitin metabolic process0.0209419681294724
GO:0004568chitinase activity0.0209419681294724
GO:0042475odontogenesis of dentine-containing teeth0.0240726321286024
GO:0005615extracellular space0.0240726321286024
GO:0000792heterochromatin0.0240726321286024
GO:0044247cellular polysaccharide catabolic process0.0240726321286024
GO:0000272polysaccharide catabolic process0.0240726321286024
GO:0000790nuclear chromatin0.0246039581569741
GO:0005903brush border0.0246039581569741
GO:0042476odontogenesis0.0258769327209588
GO:0044459plasma membrane part0.02962117468154
GO:0000776kinetochore0.0301294004526983
GO:0006885regulation of pH0.0311253213876219
GO:0006044N-acetylglucosamine metabolic process0.0311499775159384
GO:0006041glucosamine metabolic process0.0311731329495279
GO:0005605basal lamina0.0327877433031848
GO:0006040amino sugar metabolic process0.0327877433031848
GO:0007588excretion0.0327877433031848
GO:0045028purinergic nucleotide receptor activity, G-protein coupled0.0327877433031848
GO:0001608nucleotide receptor activity, G-protein coupled0.0327877433031848
GO:0016502nucleotide receptor activity0.0327877433031848
GO:0001614purinergic nucleotide receptor activity0.0327877433031848
GO:0044463cell projection part0.0342197334329908
GO:0016020membrane0.035877530424629
GO:0005774vacuolar membrane0.0431306493098143
GO:0044437vacuolar part0.0435682734962295
GO:0044454nuclear chromosome part0.0443887852564877
GO:0016324apical plasma membrane0.0443887852564877
GO:0005604basement membrane0.0473184421331456
GO:0000775chromosome, pericentric region0.0476374206378702
GO:0044264cellular polysaccharide metabolic process0.0493340200671556
GO:0005976polysaccharide metabolic process0.0493340200671556
GO:0045177apical part of cell0.0493340200671556
GO:0006821chloride transport0.0493340200671556
GO:0007200G-protein signaling, coupled to IP3 second messenger (phospholipase C activating)0.0493340200671556
GO:0048513organ development0.0493340200671556



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
GAG secreting cell5.88e-459
carbohydrate secreting cell5.88e-459
collagen secreting cell1.32e-306
chondroblast1.32e-306
chondrocyte1.32e-306
extracellular matrix secreting cell6.84e-2715
stromal cell3.29e-1928
synovial cell4.30e-163
secretory cell5.23e-1136


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.