Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:523

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:29, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr10:97069737..97069749,+p5@Kera
Mm9::chr15:101936581..101936594,+p@chr15:101936581..101936594
+
Mm9::chr15:51484092..51484121,-p@chr15:51484092..51484121
-
Mm9::chr16:95807175..95807195,-p@chr16:95807175..95807195
-
Mm9::chr16:95807232..95807250,-p@chr16:95807232..95807250
-
Mm9::chr17:23882313..23882330,-p@chr17:23882313..23882330
-
Mm9::chr18:61986651..61986691,-p@chr18:61986651..61986691
-
Mm9::chr18:7004715..7004731,-p1@Mkx
Mm9::chr1:164064835..164064864,-p3@Dnm3
Mm9::chr2:164230106..164230121,-p1@Matn4
Mm9::chr2:74505324..74505330,+p@chr2:74505324..74505330
+
Mm9::chr5:125483810..125483836,+p1@Fam101a
Mm9::chr6:51009701..51009744,-p@chr6:51009701..51009744
-
Mm9::chr8:23734491..23734495,+p1@Dkk4


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
appendage1.44e-1112
paired limb/fin1.44e-1112
limb1.44e-1112
paired limb/fin bud1.44e-1112
limb bud1.44e-1112
limb/fin field1.44e-1112
limb field1.44e-1112
forelimb1.56e-117
pectoral appendage1.56e-117
pectoral appendage bud1.56e-117
forelimb bud1.56e-117
forelimb/pectoral fin field1.56e-117
appendage girdle complex1.86e-1013
pectoral complex7.24e-108
surface structure1.06e-0922
eye1.15e-089
camera-type eye1.15e-089
simple eye1.15e-089
immature eye1.15e-089
ocular region1.15e-089
visual system1.15e-089
face1.15e-089
optic cup1.15e-089
optic vesicle1.15e-089
eye primordium1.15e-089
subdivision of head8.92e-0711


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}