Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2064

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 12:01, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2064_Intestinal_choriocarcinoma_breast_Prostate_pancreatic_colon_MCF7



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:5535609..5535633,-p@chr10:5535609..5535633
-
Hg19::chr10:5535635..5535648,-p@chr10:5535635..5535648
-
Hg19::chr10:5535762..5535773,-p@chr10:5535762..5535773
-
Hg19::chr6:3789350..3789355,-p@chr6:3789350..3789355
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
chorionic membrane mesenchymal stem cell3.09e-253
germ line cell1.06e-117
germ cell1.06e-117
intestinal epithelial cell1.26e-094
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
acellular anatomical structure3.09e-253
egg chorion3.09e-253
chorion3.77e-197
breast9.17e-1410
chest1.57e-1211
extraembryonic membrane1.11e-0914
membranous layer1.11e-0914
intestinal mucosa1.26e-094
wall of intestine1.26e-094
gastrointestinal system mucosa1.26e-094
gastrointestinal system epithelium1.26e-094
intestinal epithelium1.26e-094
gut epithelium8.65e-0754
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
thoracic cancer5.36e-344
breast cancer5.36e-344
cell type cancer1.82e-10143
islet cell tumor6.31e-101
endocrine pancreas cancer6.31e-101
pancreatic endocrine carcinoma6.31e-101
disease of anatomical entity1.20e-0939
carcinoma3.39e-09106


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CEBPB#105147.971147625824820.0002476385788090830.00267429692195655
EP300#203346.77394172622320.0004748459821442640.0043338669517753
ESR1#2099323.07645247211590.0001339105244968570.00175697000853357
FOXA1#3169411.08141974938556.62943068949433e-050.00106896883090952
FOXA2#3170424.63046375266522.71504128667089e-069.41421636582406e-05
GATA3#2625320.42738726790450.0001924415576258320.00231842240591582
HDAC2#3066413.41562023662633.0859005065161e-050.000625559710791993
HNF4G#3174428.75342252644681.46167379934821e-065.65601148314664e-05
SP1#666745.69838137814090.0009482606065333980.00682908491833827
TCF7L2#6934410.77017656313737.42969445082454e-050.0011516026398778



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.