Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1790

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 20:26, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr3:19856986..19856993,+p10@Cp
Mm9::chr3:19857037..19857073,+p2@Cp
Mm9::chr3:19857088..19857114,+p3@Cp
Mm9::chr3:19857119..19857131,+p5@Cp
Mm9::chr3:19857170..19857179,+p6@Cp


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
trunk mesenchyme5.28e-1345
anatomical conduit4.79e-12122
epithelial tube9.69e-1247
exocrine gland4.61e-1125
exocrine system4.61e-1125
mesenchyme8.96e-1161
entire embryonic mesenchyme8.96e-1161
tube1.99e-10114
trunk2.02e-1090
subdivision of trunk4.05e-1066
trunk region element2.21e-0979
liver2.81e-0922
epithelial sac2.81e-0922
digestive gland2.81e-0922
epithelium of foregut-midgut junction2.81e-0922
anatomical boundary2.81e-0922
hepatobiliary system2.81e-0922
foregut-midgut junction2.81e-0922
hepatic diverticulum2.81e-0922
liver primordium2.81e-0922
septum transversum2.81e-0922
liver bud2.81e-0922
digestive tract diverticulum6.60e-0923
sac6.60e-0923
immaterial anatomical entity1.11e-0879
abdomen element2.56e-0849
abdominal segment element2.56e-0849
abdominal segment of trunk2.56e-0849
abdomen2.56e-0849
multi-cellular organism1.90e-07333


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}