Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2301

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 21:12, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr1:194979315..194979359,+p1@Irf6
Mm9::chr1:194979361..194979373,+p2@Irf6
Mm9::chr1:194979383..194979393,+p3@Irf6
Mm9::chr6:83085822..83085868,+p1@Rtkn


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0017049GTP-Rho binding0.00635511970634964
GO:0005095GTPase inhibitor activity0.00953215727815476
GO:0017048Rho GTPase binding0.0359965604990307



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial cell1.52e-0825

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
digestive system8.21e-16116
digestive tract8.21e-16116
primitive gut8.21e-16116
intestine1.13e-1531
endoderm-derived structure1.92e-15118
endoderm1.92e-15118
presumptive endoderm1.92e-15118
subdivision of digestive tract9.67e-15114
gastrointestinal system8.29e-1447
mucosa8.24e-1015
intestinal mucosa1.27e-0813
anatomical wall1.27e-0813
wall of intestine1.27e-0813
gastrointestinal system mucosa1.27e-0813
simple columnar epithelium5.04e-0711


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}