Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3648

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 23:13, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr8:108659397..108659412,+p4@ENSMUST00000140509
Mm9::chr9:50501885..50501898,-p3@Dixdc1
Mm9::chr9:50501905..50501919,-p4@Dixdc1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
exocrine gland1.58e-1325
exocrine system1.58e-1325
trunk region element2.95e-1279
digestive tract diverticulum3.25e-1223
sac3.25e-1223
liver1.30e-1122
epithelial sac1.30e-1122
digestive gland1.30e-1122
epithelium of foregut-midgut junction1.30e-1122
anatomical boundary1.30e-1122
hepatobiliary system1.30e-1122
foregut-midgut junction1.30e-1122
hepatic diverticulum1.30e-1122
liver primordium1.30e-1122
septum transversum1.30e-1122
liver bud1.30e-1122
pancreas2.67e-1012
trunk3.77e-0990
immaterial anatomical entity4.67e-0979
abdomen element1.38e-0849
abdominal segment element1.38e-0849
abdominal segment of trunk1.38e-0849
abdomen1.38e-0849
digestive system3.13e-07116
digestive tract3.13e-07116
primitive gut3.13e-07116
endoderm-derived structure3.92e-07118
endoderm3.92e-07118
presumptive endoderm3.92e-07118
subdivision of digestive tract7.51e-07114


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}