Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2184: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
|gostat_on_coexpression_clusters=GO:0004844!uracil DNA N-glycosylase activity!0.0251497912781593!7374$GO:0006974!response to DNA damage stimulus!0.0251497912781593!11200;7374$GO:0009719!response to endogenous stimulus!0.0251497912781593!11200;7374$GO:0016605!PML body!0.0256508083652422!11200$GO:0019104!DNA N-glycosylase activity!0.0256508083652422!7374$GO:0008630!DNA damage response, signal transduction resulting in induction of apoptosis!0.0256508083652422!11200$GO:0016799!hydrolase activity, hydrolyzing N-glycosyl compounds!0.0256508083652422!7374$GO:0000077!DNA damage checkpoint!0.0256508083652422!11200$GO:0030532!small nuclear ribonucleoprotein complex!0.0256508083652422!6636$GO:0031570!DNA integrity checkpoint!0.0256508083652422!11200$GO:0006284!base-excision repair!0.0256508083652422!7374$GO:0044428!nuclear part!0.0256508083652422!11200;6636$GO:0008629!induction of apoptosis by intracellular signals!0.0256508083652422!11200$GO:0006950!response to stress!0.0265478637208075!11200;7374$GO:0042770!DNA damage response, signal transduction!0.0265478637208075!11200$GO:0000075!cell cycle checkpoint!0.0324006819574708!11200$GO:0005634!nucleus!0.0350096761340437!11200;7374;6636
|gostat_on_coexpression_clusters=GO:0004844!uracil DNA N-glycosylase activity!0.0251497912781593!7374$GO:0006974!response to DNA damage stimulus!0.0251497912781593!11200;7374$GO:0009719!response to endogenous stimulus!0.0251497912781593!11200;7374$GO:0016605!PML body!0.0256508083652422!11200$GO:0019104!DNA N-glycosylase activity!0.0256508083652422!7374$GO:0008630!DNA damage response, signal transduction resulting in induction of apoptosis!0.0256508083652422!11200$GO:0016799!hydrolase activity, hydrolyzing N-glycosyl compounds!0.0256508083652422!7374$GO:0000077!DNA damage checkpoint!0.0256508083652422!11200$GO:0030532!small nuclear ribonucleoprotein complex!0.0256508083652422!6636$GO:0031570!DNA integrity checkpoint!0.0256508083652422!11200$GO:0006284!base-excision repair!0.0256508083652422!7374$GO:0044428!nuclear part!0.0256508083652422!11200;6636$GO:0008629!induction of apoptosis by intracellular signals!0.0256508083652422!11200$GO:0006950!response to stress!0.0265478637208075!11200;7374$GO:0042770!DNA damage response, signal transduction!0.0265478637208075!11200$GO:0000075!cell cycle checkpoint!0.0324006819574708!11200$GO:0005634!nucleus!0.0350096761340437!11200;7374;6636
|id=C2184
|id=C2184
|ontology_enrichment_celltype=CL:0000066!5.52e-26!254;CL:0000012!9.16e-17!682;CL:0000548!2.26e-16!679;CL:0000004!2.26e-16!679;CL:0000255!2.26e-16!679;CL:0000003!6.27e-10!722;CL:0002321!2.20e-09!248;CL:0000220!9.27e-09!246;CL:0000063!1.35e-08!578;CL:0000076!1.45e-07!62
|ontology_enrichment_disease=DOID:162!9.31e-59!235;DOID:14566!2.07e-57!239;DOID:0050687!1.33e-31!143;DOID:0050686!1.93e-28!137;DOID:305!2.09e-26!106;DOID:2531!2.92e-23!51;DOID:0060083!2.92e-23!51;DOID:1240!2.19e-20!39;DOID:8692!3.28e-17!31;DOID:3095!3.58e-07!22;DOID:2994!3.58e-07!22
|ontology_enrichment_uberon=
}}
}}

Revision as of 14:20, 21 May 2012


Full id: C2184_diffuse_iPS_acute_Hodgkin_nonsmall_H9_HES3GFP



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr12:109535373..109535414,+p1@UNG
Hg19::chr12:96252710..96252789,+p1@SNRPF
Hg19::chr21:33651324..33651366,-p1@MIS18A
Hg19::chr22:29137782..29137837,-p1@CHEK2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0004844uracil DNA N-glycosylase activity0.0251497912781593
GO:0006974response to DNA damage stimulus0.0251497912781593
GO:0009719response to endogenous stimulus0.0251497912781593
GO:0016605PML body0.0256508083652422
GO:0019104DNA N-glycosylase activity0.0256508083652422
GO:0008630DNA damage response, signal transduction resulting in induction of apoptosis0.0256508083652422
GO:0016799hydrolase activity, hydrolyzing N-glycosyl compounds0.0256508083652422
GO:0000077DNA damage checkpoint0.0256508083652422
GO:0030532small nuclear ribonucleoprotein complex0.0256508083652422
GO:0031570DNA integrity checkpoint0.0256508083652422
GO:0006284base-excision repair0.0256508083652422
GO:0044428nuclear part0.0256508083652422
GO:0008629induction of apoptosis by intracellular signals0.0256508083652422
GO:0006950response to stress0.0265478637208075
GO:0042770DNA damage response, signal transduction0.0265478637208075
GO:0000075cell cycle checkpoint0.0324006819574708
GO:0005634nucleus0.0350096761340437



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br><br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial cell5.52e-26254
animal cell2.26e-16679
eukaryotic cell2.26e-16679
native cell6.27e-10722
embryonic cell2.20e-09248
squamous epithelial cell1.45e-0762
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
cancer9.31e-59235
disease of cellular proliferation2.07e-57239
cell type cancer1.33e-31143
organ system cancer1.93e-28137
carcinoma2.09e-26106
hematologic cancer2.92e-2351
immune system cancer2.92e-2351
leukemia2.19e-2039
myeloid leukemia3.28e-1731
germ cell and embryonal cancer3.58e-0722
germ cell cancer3.58e-0722


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.