Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4865

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 22:22, 22 January 2013 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4865_Mast_Neutrophils_Dendritic_lymphoma_CD14_CD4_tridermal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chrX:155110970..155111047,+p1@VAMP7
Hg19::chrX:1710484..1710537,+p1@AKAP17A
Hg19::chrX:1710540..1710558,+p2@AKAP17A


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
endocrine cell7.06e-079
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
female organism3.12e-1141
female reproductive organ6.04e-1037
female reproductive system6.04e-1037
neural tube1.98e-0756
neural rod1.98e-0756
future spinal cord1.98e-0756
neural keel1.98e-0756
internal female genitalia5.11e-0722
embryonic uterus6.86e-0722


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.12.05336
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.11.5435
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.12.44638
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.12.67616
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.341392
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.10.190716
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.886807
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.10.456531
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.11.84332
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.10.407479
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.15.6086
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.12.84236
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.10.31555
MA0106.12.25834
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.11.3784
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.13.97071
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.10.273764
MA0146.12.3244
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.26.37212
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.20.757898
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.21.20011
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.21.2307
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.20.264678
MA0065.20.277623
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.11.51687
MA0155.10.711948
MA0156.12.7096
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.12.05956
MA0163.10.387745
MA0164.12.32251
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.20.69213
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
ATF3#467214.97544968400580.005768294540793880.0259703803744437
BRCA1#672213.45615376214920.007119807716084560.0296450025140595
CCNT2#90536.336201576962630.003930750035764890.019149342428643
CTCFL#140690213.16431623931620.007433367036996010.0306972487139908
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0328326093735727
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.0324905295907435
EBF1#187938.9064668465690.00141523283560980.009198749198298
EGR1#195834.988179094810140.008056488137383440.0322998681220802
ELF1#199734.258097958807540.01295179875054610.0465507918545076
ELK4#2005316.2356816584680.0002336043955745990.0025659875335944
ETS1#211339.728760922202340.001085840092584840.00766036567343068
FOS#235338.99795530889440.001372499272417130.00902887701637519
GABPB1#255337.067683836182170.002832212825417420.0154979291246867
IRF1#365937.63716375356390.002244692747297240.012889458205134
NR2C2#7182221.74307393682720.002762207975496010.0151426297177485
SIN3A#2594235.408884726815140.006318961977991520.027866990542161
SIX5#147912317.0867153554590.0002004060546325010.00240494173730481
SP1#666735.69838137814090.005403962701712170.0248233840870917
SP2#6668217.43568699589640.004273568481769740.0203291832688476
SREBF1#6720231.33723296032550.00133816265136180.00887962190390592
THAP1#55145331.36914460285133.23800758564397e-050.000649585620893336
USF1#739136.361499277207960.00388404057290560.0191432427274039
YY1#752834.911170749853860.008441455341808260.0331634499865751



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.