Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C649

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:22, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C649_tonsil_esophagus_tongue_throat_trachea_cervical_lymph



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:63740740..63740746,-p@chr10:63740740..63740746
-
Hg19::chr12:53200416..53200421,+p7@CU692075
Hg19::chr12:53200838..53200857,+p1@CU692075
Hg19::chr14:106237005..106237028,+p@chr14:106237005..106237028
+
Hg19::chr14:107049312..107049315,-p2@IGHV3-53
Hg19::chr16:12334592..12334599,+p@chr16:12334592..12334599
+
Hg19::chr16:12337006..12337010,+p@chr16:12337006..12337010
+
Hg19::chr19:5850872..5850893,-p@chr19:5850872..5850893
-
Hg19::chr20:21684387..21684390,-p2@ENST00000424377
Hg19::chr20:31611454..31611461,+p8@BPIFB6
Hg19::chr2:233103160..233103171,+p@chr2:233103160..233103171
+
Hg19::chr2:40136465..40136469,+p@chr2:40136465..40136469
+
Hg19::chr8:71240162..71240173,-p@chr8:71240162..71240173
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
tonsil6.62e-411
mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue6.62e-411
lymphoid tissue6.62e-411
tonsillar ring6.62e-411
throat4.66e-212
open tracheal system trachea6.96e-212
chordate pharynx6.93e-1710
pharyngeal region of foregut6.93e-1710
pharynx1.88e-1511
esophagus1.40e-143
esophageal region1.40e-143
tongue1.83e-143
gustatory system1.83e-143
future tongue1.83e-143
upper respiratory tract2.17e-0919
adult organism2.58e-09114
segment of respiratory tract2.21e-0847
oral opening3.04e-0822
foregut5.98e-0887
respiratory tract2.17e-0754
trachea6.39e-077
respiratory airway6.39e-077


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.