Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4769

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4769_Nucleus_normal_Urothelial_Prostate_Mesenchymal_lung_Fibroblast



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr8:71520450..71520484,-p3@TRAM1
Hg19::chr8:71520485..71520511,-p4@TRAM1
Hg19::chr8:71520513..71520614,-p1@TRAM1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
animal cell9.65e-10679
eukaryotic cell9.65e-10679
fibroblast5.60e-0776
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
endoderm-derived structure5.29e-12160
endoderm5.29e-12160
presumptive endoderm5.29e-12160
digestive system1.43e-11145
digestive tract1.43e-11145
primitive gut1.43e-11145
gut epithelium2.78e-1054
endo-epithelium8.97e-0982
orifice1.04e-0736
subdivision of digestive tract1.22e-07118
connective tissue7.64e-07371


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.18.53684
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.11.80735
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.10.658629
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.13.37768
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.11.67416
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.333427
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.11.15625
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.10.405474
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.10.0185922
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.10.715722
MA0089.10
MA0090.11.77664
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.11.52002
MA0105.10.31555
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.10.560723
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.15.09957
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.12.11725
MA0146.11.70974
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.20.195278
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.21.20011
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.21.2307
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.20.264678
MA0065.20.277623
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.312019
MA0155.10.256269
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.14.34338
MA0163.11.2663
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.20.311277
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
ATF3#467322.46317452600878.81932387510763e-050.00130096238162763
BCLAF1#9774321.65264761012189.8473954032885e-050.00139602569366641
CCNT2#90536.336201576962630.003930750035764890.0191341693304707
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.0281544250892598
CTCFL#140690319.74647435897440.0001298372005551160.00172432189582602
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0327997048617473
E2F4#1874312.66806031528440.0004917987006298980.00439300072657253
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.0324624688342172
EGR1#195834.988179094810140.008056488137383440.032273850814322
ELF1#199734.258097958807540.01295179875054610.0465251740286264
FOS#235338.99795530889440.001372499272417130.00902319347299336
FOXA1#3169311.08141974938550.000734755275698670.0058453005970973
GATA1#2623313.56030814380040.0004009615963782630.00389689448763721
HDAC2#3066313.41562023662630.0004140761399857210.00393894689716447
HMGN3#932438.178547723350590.001827766942164210.0109329983775881
JUND#372736.994663941871030.002921845042734990.0157759693128367
MAX#414936.452555509007120.003721913834265510.0187503236185835
MEF2A#4205318.74323090964410.0001518243905622470.00195492387201707
MEF2C#4208341.31135449262411.41744912101957e-050.000340784918853966
MYC#460935.22228187160940.007020843755740150.0296274556954118
NFKB1#479035.488063424193840.006049381815655430.0270957407661894
NRF1#4899312.21027944771090.0005492172401020010.00473851295654795
PAX5#507936.669565531177830.003370290999677260.0173762068280246
RAD21#5885310.35503389545630.0009004912073565420.00669083673912278
RXRA#6256320.07461713913330.0001235730348432220.00166098380772089
SETDB1#9869340.32002617801051.52461559299059e-050.000360247348227023
SIN3A#2594235.408884726815140.006318961977991520.0278481757962468
SP1#666735.69838137814090.005403962701712170.0248059274175509
SP2#6668326.15353049384465.58768218891694e-050.00094307036219828
SPI1#668838.204323508522730.001810593189410520.0109462542465323
STAT1#6772320.70658749719920.0001125992441046670.00155428924861846
TAF7#6879311.43306940492390.0006690181981945830.00546085123886237
TCF12#6938310.63446490218640.0008313523990202070.00632286725904976
TCF7L2#6934310.77017656313730.0008003181298398380.00617816728230785
TFAP2A#7020316.5186343730450.0002218033880766340.00249702749243673
TFAP2C#7022310.80922860986020.0007916746575753130.00619385044291768
USF1#739136.361499277207960.00388404057290560.0191306033481271
YY1#752834.911170749853860.008441455341808260.0331435020467336
ZNF143#7702313.50087655222790.0004062804962997170.00390677918727982



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.