Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2780

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:25, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2780_immature_Dendritic_skeletal_renal_tongue_pancreas_amniotic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr4:152330321..152330350,+p1@FAM160A1
Hg19::chr4:152330355..152330373,+p2@FAM160A1
Hg19::chr4:152330390..152330405,+p3@FAM160A1
Hg19::chr6:26252009..26252025,+p5@HIST1H2BH


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial cell2.02e-17253
endo-epithelial cell2.96e-1242
endodermal cell1.10e-0958
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
endoderm-derived structure9.27e-17160
endoderm9.27e-17160
presumptive endoderm9.27e-17160
digestive system1.22e-14145
digestive tract1.22e-14145
primitive gut1.22e-14145
subdivision of digestive tract7.56e-13118
respiratory system2.19e-1174
foregut9.89e-1087
organ4.57e-09503
primordium2.21e-08160
respiratory tract6.04e-0854
respiratory primordium2.69e-0738
endoderm of foregut2.69e-0738
endo-epithelium5.50e-0782
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
carcinoma2.24e-20106
cell type cancer1.85e-13143
adenocarcinoma1.25e-0725
squamous cell carcinoma1.47e-0714


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186944.907389214879320.001724022357361790.010671200793013
E2F6#187645.017155731697390.00157802193473060.0099852791785113
FOSL2#2355312.69765045342130.000787568572975710.00616911979247057
HEY1#2346244.040111043105710.00375304636917980.0186463255673265
MYC#460945.22228187160940.001344309395272740.00889103469906208
NRF1#489939.157709585783180.002061953791733420.0119657938575789
RAD21#588537.766275421592250.0033411193858720.0172727040659878
TAF1#687243.343046285745290.008005664898701650.0323007006511687
TBP#690843.706770687096390.005296377814784350.0244820927059513
TCF12#6938410.63446490218647.8163066689251e-050.00120189524763821
ZEB1#6935312.66632401315790.000793336075912850.00613469764787962



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.