Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1352: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=0,0,

Latest revision as of 11:43, 17 September 2013


Full id: C1352_pancreas_salivary_small_submaxillary_parotid_nonsmall_smallcell



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:827285..827326,+p3@EFCAB4A
Hg19::chr19:51324268..51324291,-p@chr19:51324268..51324291
-
Hg19::chr21:42688657..42688671,+p2@FAM3B
Hg19::chr21:42688675..42688685,+p4@FAM3B
Hg19::chr21:42688686..42688769,+p1@FAM3B
Hg19::chr7:1495053..1495064,-p@chr7:1495053..1495064
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0030073insulin secretion0.0119282334752735
GO:0030072peptide hormone secretion0.0119282334752735
GO:0002790peptide secretion0.0119282334752735
GO:0046879hormone secretion0.0146862356396595
GO:0015833peptide transport0.0146862356396595
GO:0003001generation of a signal involved in cell-cell signaling0.0219565634295245



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism2.46e-27114
subdivision of digestive tract6.90e-18118
endoderm-derived structure1.17e-15160
endoderm1.17e-15160
presumptive endoderm1.17e-15160
digestive system2.23e-15145
digestive tract2.23e-15145
primitive gut2.23e-15145
organ system subdivision1.58e-13223
gastrointestinal system8.90e-1325
intestine1.45e-0917
anatomical cluster1.36e-08373
foregut1.57e-0887
male reproductive organ4.62e-0811
multi-tissue structure7.01e-08342
male organism1.45e-0722
male reproductive system1.45e-0722
immaterial anatomical entity4.01e-07117
embryo4.35e-07592


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.14.63763
MA0004.10.558729
MA0006.10.391183
MA0007.10.539222
MA0009.11.03681
MA0014.11.56589
MA0017.10.432438
MA0019.10.7124
MA0024.10.929647
MA0025.11.17262
MA0027.12.65688
MA0028.10.408079
MA0029.10.949428
MA0030.10.937696
MA0031.10.871496
MA0038.10.665566
MA0040.10.955415
MA0041.10.578072
MA0042.10.544748
MA0043.11.03713
MA0046.11.02569
MA0048.17.14817
MA0050.10.545671
MA0051.10.661179
MA0052.10.959373
MA0055.10.808182
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.450439
MA0058.10.458909
MA0059.10.457555
MA0060.10.267412
MA0061.10.671725
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.66601
MA0067.11.35893
MA0068.10.199491
MA0069.11.02175
MA0070.11.01032
MA0071.10.625297
MA0072.11.00572
MA0073.12.2353
MA0074.10.660398
MA0076.10.475586
MA0077.10.997832
MA0078.10.763954
MA0081.10.457725
MA0083.11.04447
MA0084.11.5477
MA0087.11.00322
MA0088.10.0971959
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.490736
MA0091.10.561458
MA0092.10.522012
MA0093.11.02138
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.679972
MA0101.10.397846
MA0103.11.76074
MA0105.11.34409
MA0106.10.70837
MA0107.10.320267
MA0108.20.868347
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.504913
MA0113.10.725375
MA0114.10.314898
MA0115.11.28169
MA0116.10.323925
MA0117.11.07516
MA0119.10.440684
MA0122.11.10154
MA0124.11.23968
MA0125.11.15445
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.84113
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.06778
MA0136.10.672893
MA0139.13.45912
MA0140.10.622527
MA0141.10.455728
MA0142.10.838805
MA0143.10.725558
MA0144.10.811435
MA0145.10.347815
MA0146.11.05598
MA0147.10.327615
MA0148.10.584698
MA0149.10.612449
MA0062.20.23336
MA0035.20.621793
MA0039.23.75773
MA0138.20.765223
MA0002.20.255126
MA0137.21.06611
MA0104.20.735746
MA0047.20.695777
MA0112.25.21904
MA0065.20.718489
MA0150.11.21643
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.629368
MA0153.11.13732
MA0154.11.3291
MA0155.12.1986
MA0156.10.417278
MA0157.10.810597
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.875329
MA0160.10.600559
MA0161.10
MA0162.11.39622
MA0163.10.813808
MA0164.10.738243
MA0080.20.394469
MA0018.20.709805
MA0099.20.629739
MA0079.22.24517
MA0102.21.58513
MA0258.11.43672
MA0259.10.893594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.