Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2713

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:54, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr11:75327050..75327084,+p1@Scarf1
Mm9::chr14:31981773..31981792,-p1@Stab1
Mm9::chr6:115944846..115944875,-p1@Plxnd1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0017154semaphorin receptor activity0.0471497582777031
GO:0005540hyaluronic acid binding0.0471497582777031
GO:0004872receptor activity0.0471497582777031
GO:0001569patterning of blood vessels0.0471497582777031
GO:0060089molecular transducer activity0.0471497582777031
GO:0004871signal transducer activity0.0471497582777031



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
trunk region element1.36e-1479
multi-cellular organism3.12e-12333
subdivision of trunk6.73e-1266
trunk6.96e-1090
immaterial anatomical entity1.26e-0879
tissue1.48e-08349
lung3.38e-0814
respiratory tube3.38e-0814
respiration organ3.38e-0814
pair of lungs3.38e-0814
lung primordium3.38e-0814
lung bud3.38e-0814
epithelial tube7.95e-0847
abdomen element1.00e-0749
abdominal segment element1.00e-0749
abdominal segment of trunk1.00e-0749
abdomen1.00e-0749
primary circulatory organ2.67e-0718
heart2.67e-0718
primitive heart tube2.67e-0718
primary heart field2.67e-0718
anterior lateral plate mesoderm2.67e-0718
heart tube2.67e-0718
heart primordium2.67e-0718
cardiac mesoderm2.67e-0718
cardiogenic plate2.67e-0718
heart rudiment2.67e-0718
epithelial bud4.08e-0717


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}