Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2425

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 21:23, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr5:43906752..43906773,+p2@C1qtnf7
Mm9::chr5:43906990..43907033,+p1@C1qtnf7
Mm9::chr5:43907045..43907057,+p3@C1qtnf7
Mm9::chr5:43907160..43907169,+p5@C1qtnf7


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
anatomical space2.61e-1857
body cavity precursor1.15e-1338
body cavity2.18e-1337
body cavity or lining2.18e-1337
anatomical cavity2.42e-1339
immaterial anatomical entity4.33e-1379
trunk region element7.43e-1179
gonad4.70e-1018
gonad primordium4.70e-1018
lung5.16e-1014
respiratory tube5.16e-1014
respiration organ5.16e-1014
pair of lungs5.16e-1014
lung primordium5.16e-1014
lung bud5.16e-1014
reproductive structure9.54e-1026
reproductive system9.54e-1026
reproductive organ1.25e-0924
multi-cellular organism1.38e-09333
external genitalia1.98e-0917
indifferent external genitalia1.98e-0917
indifferent gonad1.98e-0917
trunk3.92e-0990
primordium9.65e-09134
epithelial bud2.38e-0817
subdivision of trunk3.41e-0866
male reproductive organ6.25e-0815
testis1.05e-0714
male organism1.42e-0716
male reproductive system1.42e-0716


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}